Jump to content

 

 

Club 1872 meeting with Dave King


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, boabie said:

I'll disagree slightly with that one mate.

At that time there were only very few on FF moaning about Murray. I was one of them.

I only remember Cammy Fraser going on about him on here. Cammy said often it was a bad bomb waiting to go off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, pete said:

I only remember Cammy Fraser going on about him on here. Cammy said often it was a bad bomb waiting to go off.

I wasn't here at the time so can only talk about my [short] time on FF.

What became the Gub , myself and about 3 other regulars were the only ones speaking out against the sham that was Murray.

The warnings about fraud, nepotism and the rest were all made years before they affected the club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, boabie said:

I wasn't here at the time so can only talk about my [short] time on FF.

What became the Gub , myself and about 3 other regulars were the only ones speaking out against the sham that was Murray.

The warnings about fraud, nepotism and the rest were all made years before they affected the club.

Cammy still comes on now and again but he was crying out for us to realise what Murray was doing. Unfortunately no one was listening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gonzo79 said:

Perhaps.  Are you suggesting fans should just keep out of it and hope for the best?

No, I’ve not suggested that at all, only that a 10% shareholding doesn’t bring the influence many would have you believe. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Bill said:

No, I’ve not suggested that at all, only that a 10% shareholding doesn’t bring the influence many would have you believe. 

Just out of curiosity how many shares did it take for Alastair Johnston to becoming a director, or an ''Individual person of  significant control''

 

It seems to me individuals or someone representing corporate identities can become a director or have significance without having share control or even many shares. I'm thinking of the old regime were faces just appeared and disappeared at whim. then now we have Mr Johnston suddenly appear again.

Edited by aweebluesoandso
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, aweebluesoandso said:

Just out of curiosity how many shares did it take for Alastair Johnston to becoming a director, or an ''Individual person of  significant control''

 

It seems to me individuals or someone representing corporate identities can become a director or have significance without having share control or even many shares. I'm thinking of the old regime were faces just appeared and disappeared at whim. then now we have Mr Johnston suddenly appear again.

AJ isn't a director due to his shareholding. He has presumably been brought on board because he is able to contribute in some way.

 

Generally we want people of ability or those who can contribute something on the board, and not just those with the largest shareholding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.