Gonzo79 13,750 Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 I was referring to the fanzine, not the forum. But I agree with you on Murray. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 21 minutes ago, boabie said: I'll disagree slightly with that one mate. At that time there were only very few on FF moaning about Murray. I was one of them. I only remember Cammy Fraser going on about him on here. Cammy said often it was a bad bomb waiting to go off. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 57 minutes ago, pete said: I only remember Cammy Fraser going on about him on here. Cammy said often it was a bad bomb waiting to go off. I wasn't here at the time so can only talk about my [short] time on FF. What became the Gub , myself and about 3 other regulars were the only ones speaking out against the sham that was Murray. The warnings about fraud, nepotism and the rest were all made years before they affected the club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted March 25, 2018 Share Posted March 25, 2018 26 minutes ago, boabie said: I wasn't here at the time so can only talk about my [short] time on FF. What became the Gub , myself and about 3 other regulars were the only ones speaking out against the sham that was Murray. The warnings about fraud, nepotism and the rest were all made years before they affected the club. Cammy still comes on now and again but he was crying out for us to realise what Murray was doing. Unfortunately no one was listening. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 6 hours ago, Gonzo79 said: Probably not much but at least we'd have people closer to the situation than we did previously. Closer as in not close at all? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,214 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 I have one question for king and it's just what do you carry in that big bag he is always humfing about with him 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 13,750 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 4 hours ago, Bill said: Closer as in not close at all? Perhaps. Are you suggesting fans should just keep out of it and hope for the best? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 2 hours ago, Gonzo79 said: Perhaps. Are you suggesting fans should just keep out of it and hope for the best? No, I’ve not suggested that at all, only that a 10% shareholding doesn’t bring the influence many would have you believe. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 26, 2018 Share Posted March 26, 2018 (edited) 29 minutes ago, Bill said: No, I’ve not suggested that at all, only that a 10% shareholding doesn’t bring the influence many would have you believe. Just out of curiosity how many shares did it take for Alastair Johnston to becoming a director, or an ''Individual person of significant control'' It seems to me individuals or someone representing corporate identities can become a director or have significance without having share control or even many shares. I'm thinking of the old regime were faces just appeared and disappeared at whim. then now we have Mr Johnston suddenly appear again. Edited March 26, 2018 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,354 Posted March 26, 2018 Author Share Posted March 26, 2018 12 minutes ago, aweebluesoandso said: Just out of curiosity how many shares did it take for Alastair Johnston to becoming a director, or an ''Individual person of significant control'' It seems to me individuals or someone representing corporate identities can become a director or have significance without having share control or even many shares. I'm thinking of the old regime were faces just appeared and disappeared at whim. then now we have Mr Johnston suddenly appear again. AJ isn't a director due to his shareholding. He has presumably been brought on board because he is able to contribute in some way. Generally we want people of ability or those who can contribute something on the board, and not just those with the largest shareholding. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.