T-1000 174 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Bill said: I love it. Proud to have The Donald on board. ???️ His two sons seem to be the ones in charge in what is not a very profitable business. The partnership does, however, generate publicity, good and bad depending on your perspective. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 Just now, T-1000 said: His two sons seem to be the ones in charge in what is not a very profitable business. The partnership does, however, generate publicity, good and bad depending on your perspective. Actually I think his daughter is the one who's very much in charge. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-1000 174 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bill said: Actually I think his daughter is the one who's very much in charge. She may have been but the current directors are his two sons. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 33 minutes ago, Uilleam said: The beneficiary of a deliberately constructed mis-trial. A bit like Griffiths of rasellik. Was it though ? He was actually impeached, the acquittal was, from what I understand (and I could be wrong) nothing to do with mis-trial and more to do with Republicans (Mitt Romney aside) voting along party lines and as they had a majority in the House the acquittal was always expected. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,159 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 (edited) Bring him onboard make him chairman let him conduct the press conferences Edited February 6, 2020 by compo 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,444 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 39 minutes ago, craig said: Was it though ? He was actually impeached, the acquittal was, from what I understand (and I could be wrong) nothing to do with mis-trial and more to do with Republicans (Mitt Romney aside) voting along party lines and as they had a majority in the House the acquittal was always expected. The 'Jury' ie Republican Senators declined to hear witnesses. What kind of trial is that? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 19 minutes ago, Uilleam said: The 'Jury' ie Republican Senators declined to hear witnesses. What kind of trial is that? Even had they heard witnesses they would have voted for an acquittal. It was a pointless exercise to hear witnesses. Same as it was for Clinton i.e. Democrats and Republicans would have voted along party lines. The trial aspect was a complete waste of time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill 13,717 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 23 minutes ago, Uilleam said: The 'Jury' ie Republican Senators declined to hear witnesses. What kind of trial is that? The sort of trial that didn’t want to be deliberately stalled for months to provide a posturing platform for Democrats who had already said they were presenting enough evidence to guarantee conviction. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnMc 2,480 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 Every golf club I've ever been in contained people who make Donald Trump seem like a liberal feminist. A good walk spoiled. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 13,699 Posted February 6, 2020 Share Posted February 6, 2020 It's interesting to see people going mad about a partnership with a golf course, who say nothing about sponsorship deals with gambling and alcohol firms. I can't stand golf, by the way. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.