Jump to content

 

 

[FT] Rangers 1 (Morelos 64) - 2 Celtic


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Blue Moon said:

I missed that.  How did he explain that?

 

Said the team he picked played well in last OF game and were superb away at Tynecastle. He also said that both Cantwell and Raskin had only played 2 1/2 games against teams who surrendered the ball and territory. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bill said:

I thought Jack was excellent when he came on today and made a huge difference.

He was and has been good when he’s been fit and playing, but can we rely on him staying fit?

 

Tilman had a shocker, but is it any surprise given how poor the central midfield was that he struggled to get in to the game today?

 

We have signed some good players, but the core of the squad is still the same bunch of serial underachievers. Signing Raskin and Cantwell is a good start, but we really need to carry on the rebuild in the summer. Nothing’s really changed this season has it? I still think the same players should leave as I did six months ago.

 

Roofe and Helander are too injury prone.

Kamara is a shadow of his former self.

Lundstram blows hot and cold.

Barisic and Tav are really poor defensively.

Morelos is his usual frustrating self.

Kent surely isn’t worth the money he’s looking for.

Sakala is so erratic and frustrating, but also impetuous and unpredictable. Worth keeping as a sub?

 

I think Goldson and Davies are starting to look much more solid together. Add a decent keeper and some full backs who are better defensively, along with Raskin in front of the CBs and we should have a much stronger spine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Sutton_blows_goats said:

He can make his excuses. The board backed him with 2 players

he chose not to play them in the defining game of the season so far. Can’t pin that on a

lack of backing. Can you?

But you can - we need more than two players. 

 

What MB supplied post match were reasons and not excuses. 

 

Player let us all down today, team picked should have been good enough but it wasn't. 

 

Two goals we lost were result of more schoolboy defending and having Raskin and Cantwell on from the start wouldn't have stopped those goals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CammyF said:

But you can - we need more than two players. 

 

What MB supplied post match were reasons and not excuses. 

 

Player let us all down today, team picked should have been good enough but it wasn't. 

 

Two goals we lost were result of more schoolboy defending and having Raskin and Cantwell on from the start wouldn't have stopped those goals.

I’ve been quite clear on this forum we need more than 2 players. Others including our manager have said different.

glad he is starting to come round to my thinking👍

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

I’ve been quite clear on this forum we need more than 2 players. Others including our manager have said different.

glad he is starting to come round to my thinking👍

When did MB say different? We tried to get at least one other player in January.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CammyF said:

Said the team he picked played well in last OF game and were superb away at Tynecastle. He also said that both Cantwell and Raskin had only played 2 1/2 games against teams who surrendered the ball and territory. 

So it wasn't down to fitness?

 

Not picking Raskin was stupid.  I'm more concerned about Beale's managerial skills than I was before I read this.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.