Should Beale be sacked?

[ranger_syntax 3,793]

Now that we have a majority voting for no it is time for the admins to declare this the official position of the gersnet forum.

[Gonzo79 13,750]

People seem keen to delay the inevitable.  

[RANGERRAB 3,296]

16 minutes ago, Bill said:

Surely everything we've been through these past few years tells you that never works.

We’ve had too many managers. That’s a big part of the problem 

[Bill 13,717]

1 hour ago, RANGERRAB said:

We’ve had too many managers. That’s a big part of the problem 

We've only had too many because we've had the wrong ones. Is there any manager of the last 12 years you would recommend re-hiring?

[RANGERRAB 3,296]

27 minutes ago, Bill said:

We've only had too many because we've had the wrong ones. Is there any manager of the last 12 years you would recommend re-hiring?

So who would be your ‘right ones’ we should have hired or should now hire?

[Malangsob 1,216]

6 minutes ago, Bill said:

We've only had too many because we've had the wrong ones. Is there any manager of the last 12 years you would recommend re-hiring?

Stuart McCall...

Only because Murty has opened a yoga academy and is unavailable.

[Bill 13,717]

1 minute ago, RANGERRAB said:

So who would be your ‘right ones’ we should have hired or should now hire?

I'll take that as a no then.

 

As for the "right ones", I have absolutely no idea ..... but that doesn't mean someone whose job it is to know shouldn't get it right.

 

Not that we have a DoF anymore, having pandered to Beale's preference not to work with one. There's no end to the damage our manager is doing to the club.

[CammyF 6,885]

10 hours ago, Bill said:

I'll take that as a no then.

 

As for the "right ones", I have absolutely no idea ..... but that doesn't mean someone whose job it is to know shouldn't get it right.

 

Not that we have a DoF anymore, having pandered to Beale's preference not to work with one. There's no end to the damage our manager is doing to the club.

I would suggest if the board pandered to Beale, then it's the board who are damaging the club. 

[ranger_syntax 3,793]

8 minutes ago, CammyF said:

I would suggest if the board pandered to Beale, then it's the board who are damaging the club. 

Quite controversial.

 

I am ignorant of such things but I have it on good authority that Bennet and Bisgrove are of the highest quality.

 

Would they allow the club to be damaged?

[alexscottislegend 2,090]

14 hours ago, Bill said:

In the mad, mad world of Michael Beale this is progress......

 

Dessers for Colak = £5m for Worse

Danilo for Sakala = £6.3m for Worse

Lammers for Hagi = £3.5m for no better

Cifuentes for Kamara = £1.4m for no better

Sima for Kent = No better but possibly cheaper

Dowell, Sterling, Balogun all disappeared from sight

I would just add that Lammers is inferior to Hagi. Thought Dowell looked promising in some of the pre-seasons before fading from view. Otherwise no argument.😒