Jump to content

 

 

Bluedell

  • Posts

    17,839
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    99

Everything posted by Bluedell

  1. No. I didn't say that. No. I didn't say that. Things have changed, including the way that referees act in games involving us. if you're harking back to incidents 12 years ago to prove a point then perhaps you're missing it. Yes, I was there and we were lucky in a number of ways that day, including the fact that we were only playing St Mirren. Are you suggesting that we don't worry about getting players sent off? You really can't guarantee that. Porteous would be delighted at one of our players taking the bait, reacting and getting sent off. You'e wanting our p[layers o fall into thei traps. Agreed. Agreed. That's the kind of reaction we need.
  2. The players can't do anything. They will just get sent off if they do. It's currently a no-win situation and we won't be allowed to win the league. Something has to be done off the park. The club need to take the nuclear option and start highlighting the issues and putting pressure on both the SPFL, the SFA and refs to get parity of treatment. However our directors, like most before them, seem unwilling to do it.
  3. Roofe and Itten. I can't see them buying a third 'quality' striker.
  4. Lincoln Red Imps 0 Rangers 3 FGS Itten Edited 14.40.
  5. Don't think so. I think that she went once as part of a project before she started with us and made the "paradise" comment, probably as a neutral. I believe she's a NUFC fan.
  6. When we got close, it was very noticeable that the refereeing standards changed and we got a whole lot more decisions made against us. I'm not convinced we'll be allowed to win the title. Even look at the League Cup final. An offside goal that mysteriously didn't get picked up.
  7. I strongly disagree. Look at the way that refs are scared to send off Celtic players due to the way that their manager, the club and their support would react. They know that they can make dodgy decision against us and the comments that come from us will cause a small ripple and then be forgotten. We're allowing refs to carry on the uneven way that they ref games and we're at a disadvantage because of it.
  8. So he's saying no other player would get sent off for it, other than Morelos, even though it's a red card offence?
  9. I'm not sure what he meant. Did he mean that Alfie would have got a red card because it was a red card offence, or did he mean that Alfie would have got a red card because he gets sent off for non-red card offences but no other player would get sent off for it?
  10. The comments were mild. He should have been a lot more hard-hitting. "I don't want to make any headlines and say the kid should have got this, or should have got that. I don't want to be that type of manager. But what I would say is I'd be very interested to see what the decision would have been from the officials if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Alfredo who's made that tackle." He even admits that he doesn't want to be that type of manager. He just says he's be interested in what the decision would have been the other way around. At no point does he say it should have been a red card or that the ref got it wrong. It's so wishy-washy and he's yet again not standing up for his players, and he's worrying more about what type of manager he is.
  11. The time to react was over a year ago. We'll just do what we normally do and meekly accept it. The manager doesn't want to rock the boat too much due to the risk of damaging "Brand Gerrard" and the directors don't seem to be too keen on doing anything either.
  12. Rangers 3 - 0 Dundee United FGS Kent
  13. Yes, but it's not all Celtic fans that are being accused. If someone accused the UB of something, would you feel that you were being accused? You're widening the discussion to include all Celtic fans, many of whom revel in the victimhood to which you refer. However the point was made on the GB, who don't feel like that (not very 'Ultra') so I don't think that the argument of victimhood stacks up.
  14. I never mentioned "the Tims".
  15. You really don't understand the mentality of the GB.
  16. I'm aware of at least one other similar incident, so it wouldn't be their first.
  17. His stripper ex-gf is really nice and wouldn't do that sort of thing.
  18. What's going to happen in a couple of days?
  19. Good to see that the term "old firm" was used rather than making accusations against Celtic fans.
  20. It's not the first time McGregor has been targeted: So that's at least 3 times. Not to forget his girlfriend's. and people think we should wait before offering opinions as to who did it this time.....
  21. They've got previous for torching stuff, so they are the most likely. Not sure why we need solid proof before offering an opinion and why there are those who are rushing to the defence of the GB and insisting on on proof before they get accused of something.
  22. Why do I need to be careful? I guess you don't like accusations being made against your fellow left wing pro-Palestinians.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.