sairdy

Pete it has nothing to do with having a tv. You only pay the fee if you watch a live broadcast. So if you only watch iplayer then you do not need to pay anything.

http://iplayerhelp.external.bbc.co.uk/help/playing_tv_progs/tvlicence http://www.tvlicensing.co.uk/faqs/FAQ103/ I have a tv connected to a Wii, Xbox, WD hard drive payer and a Dvd player. Not to a live feed. Also watch loads of stuff on iplayer. All with no tv licence. All perfcetly legal. If you have a similar set up. Do not pay the fee.

Apologies to the football hooligans that I may have offended by calling them fucknuts and twats.

4 types of football hooligan 1. Micro-penis/penile dysfunction. 2. Abused as a kid. 3. Closet homosexual. 4. The perfect storm, all 3. The people who buy this book probably read the guardian to earnestly.

Not a big fan of Irvine, no. Least his are fiction. These twats should have left this shit in primary school.

No idea why anybody woud want to read a book about a bunch of fucknuts.

http://tomkinstimes.com/2011/09/4th-october-premier-league-broadcasting-d-day/'>http://tomkinstimes.com/2011/09/4th-october-premier-league-broadcasting-d-day/ The Premier League (PL) will soon find out whether they have won or lost a court case that may totally change the way supporters watch PL football. This will have significant implications for every PL club, including Liverpool. Yet very few people yet seem to be aware of what is just around the corner... Link : http://tomkinstimes.com/2011/09/4th-october-premier-league-broadcasting-d-day/ Bubble burst?

Link to transcript. http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/ORSearch/ReportView.aspx?r=6370&mode=pdf

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Steed-Malbranque/265200978954 I joined a facebook page to send my thoughts on and it seems it was a poor taste hoax. At this point I do not know the truth. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/14797761.stm

There is also a story that he dosent have a son, and that its a sick hoax. I do not know whats true.

For the comedy value alone of wtching the creep vote for thought crime, and him making Pat Nevin look good, I would give it a watch.

That was the very 1, Many thanks.

That 1 will do, thanks for the help.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150236055347079&set=a.391986177078.192462.626507078&type=1&theater Its from my face book page, dont know if it will work.

Same here I cant get pic to load and the buttons and text are all kixed up and over apping, thought it was just me.

2-2. on the night.

That bit of film is a clear hatchet job. The edit is clearly out of context. I dont care for a BBC apology, I would prefer them to hand over all the footage and let us show it on the Rangers website. Un-edited.

15 mins to go. Wylde on for Ortiz. No idea why Ortiz was playing on the left. Next goal is the winner. Hope we get it, don't think we will.

1-1 Naismith. Header

Could not agree more. I would like to see Ortiz on the right as well.

Danny I used to look forward to buying Follow Follow at the games, I thought it was a great fanzine. I was really disturbed by my treatment there. I stood my ground with the guy in charge and as soon as I was reinstated I chose never to go back. I have read lots of similar posts about Ã?£Ã?£ on RM so I know that sadly I was not a sole case. I'm awake at strange hours When Whyte took over I posted a link on RM to the first newspaper story that had quotes in it. I looked on the thread a few times and after a few posts about the quotes the thread turned into a slagging match between 6 or so people. They were not debating Whyte they were arguing about whether Nike or Umbro made better shirts. That was pretty much the end for me. I have no idea why people need to be disrespectful online. We have both conceded points regarding Smith. We both have our thoughts and our positions. I was never going to try and change anybody’s mind. I just wanted to see what people thought and see what the reaction would be. I think we both can guess what the reaction would be if I had posted on Ã?£Ã?£ and RM. I look forward to agreeing and disagreeing with you in the future.

Calscot I don't feel that me being glad Smith is gone is outrageous. Your happy with him. I’m not. As for the rest of your post. I Am new here so can't comment on that. I was banned from Follow Follow after 1 post, after a few emails back and forth I was un-banned. I decided not to use that site. I have been on Rangers Media (RM) for a few years now I like it but I think it has a very young demographic. I'm old (39) I feel on RM there is a lot of hyperbole and massive swings in opinion. For example after the Kaunas game if you were for Smith in any way you were getting abused slagged and the punctuation police were after you. At the end of the season Smith won the league and if you were against him then you got the same as the aforementioned. I took part in neither. I accept that I’m in the minority regarding Smith. This has been my first thread on this site I wanted to see what people felt about things and how somebody who is new and holds a minority position would be treated. Very well I may add. Thanks for the reply.

Fair enough Zappa. I accept that sometimes it's better with the devil you know. I was just sick of SDM many many times over.

Matter of fact Der Berliner I never said that you called me arrogant. I just said I wasn't

You seem stuck on this arrogant thing Der Berliner. At no point have I ever said that I assume we have the right to win anything. Zappa, Does the end of SDM not rank in your top 5? ( I will stay away from asking anybody else about Smith...) Thanks for the reply.