Jump to content

 

 

BrahimHemdani

  • Posts

    11,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BrahimHemdani

  1. I don't know if I was asked specifically about my own numbers before today but if I was and answered with the percentages then I was just being diplomatic because as I said I was told in confidence. At the outset I was just told that I had been elected; then after 2 emails and a phone call I was told my percentage and that I had won by 22%; after another call I got the actual numbers for each candidate in my category (in confidence). I didn't post this whole boring process because I didn't think it was necessary. I posted the information that I was able to post. There was no attempt by me to mislead anyone. I have nothing to hide in this. Rangers have caused the situation by failing to publish the full results and I won't be slow in telling them that at the meeting.
  2. I can only agree with the general thrust of the points that are being made here, the full figures should be released by the Club; I told them they would have to do that and I can give an assurance I will pursue this.
  3. I don't believe there is any contradiction, Zappa. As you correctly point out the question then was "Can we have a complete breakdown of the voting numbers, please - both numbers of votes and percentages - for all candidates?" I answered honestly that " I don't have the breakdown of the voting numbers" and I don't. The question Hildy asked today is different and I have answered equally honestly. I have my own figures but not those applicable to any other candidate nor do I know the overall turnout. I don't know the exact date that I obtained my own figures as I followed up the emails by phone but it must have been within a day or two of the emails.
  4. As I said I did that twice on 25 September following legitimate requests on here and it was also my own opinion in any event. Since I didn't get a satisfactory response, the correct thing to do in my opinion is to raise it formally at a meeting and I have said I will do that. We agree on the basic premise, kindly allow me to pursue it in my own way.
  5. That's not reasonable, you know it's not reasonable and it's not going to happen. There will be occasions when a certain member of staff is asked to attend to deal a with a certain issue or issues but that is another matter.
  6. I am not answering any further questions on this. As has been noted by others in this thread, and as you are ably demonstrating here, anything I say will be dissected and used against me by you. I have made my position perfectly clear in the two posts above, I have nothing further to add. Anything else is a matter for the Club.
  7. I agree with you 100% and I made the point very forcibly at the time. An election not only has to be fair it has to be seen to be fair and the turnout and votes cast for each candidate are part of that process. I was advised the percentage vote I secured (49%) and only after much pushing did I get the percentages for all 3 candidates in my category. I agree that this is not satisfactory and I will push hard for the full figures to be released and if I have the backing of my colleagues I don't see how Rangers could resist.
  8. It might be a little inhibiting but they can be excluded as you say and on the whole I think it's beneficial.
  9. I agree but I was just responding to Hildy's point. I don't think it's impossible in the fullness of time if the RFB is successful but a fans representative on any Club board is in a very difficult position because of confidentiality.
  10. Yes I do; but I was given the figures in confidence and I will respect that confidence. I do not believe it is appropriate for the figures to be released piecemeal. I twice asked for all the figures to be published at the time of the declaration on 25 September. I will ask again at the next meeting.
  11. I have some sympathy with this point but it is actually helpful to have senior staff present as they can answer certain points right away. If you review the Membership Scheme thread that Frankie has reposted then you will see that I said as much in the OP: "The proposal would be that the members would elect a Supporters Board (as in the Hamburg model) and that that Board would elect one or two members to the Club Board."
  12. 12.9 The Club, where possible, shall be represented at every meeting of the RFB by at least one member of staff of the Club and no more than three members of staff of the Club; for the avoidance of doubt, no representative or staff member of the Club shall be entitled to vote on any matter to be determined at RFB meetings ........The chairperson shall have the ability, if he/she so wishes, to request that staff members of the Club vacate the meeting at any time, including, when any vote is taking place.
  13. 10. Election 10.1 Elections to RFB will be held once per year during the Term in or around June or July or at any other time that is reasonably practicable for the Club. 10.2 Candidates will be announced to the Members via fansboard.rangers.co.uk and http://www.rangers.co.uk'>http://www.rangers.co.uk.'>http://www.rangers.co.uk. 10.3 Once the Candidates have been announced, the Club will fix a specific period of time during which Members will be entitled to vote in the ballot for election of Candidates to RFB. The voting period will be no greater than 21 days. 10.4 Each Member shall be entitled to one single vote for each Category. 10.5 For the avoidance of doubt Junior Members shall not be eligible to vote in any election to RFB. 10.6 Voting will be conducted by way of an “on-line” poll only, which will be securely available to Members. Voting shall not be allowed by any other means. The Club will intimate to Members notice of an election and where possible publicise on fansboard.rangers.co.uk and http://www.rangers.co.uk the process by which votes can be cast. 10.7 The Club will be solely responsible for ensuring that all votes are accurately counted. 10.8 Members shall only be able to vote once for each Category during each Election. 10.9 Votes cast after the ballot has closed will not be valid or counted. 10.10 Subject to clause 9.2, the Candidate with the highest number of votes in each category will be elected to RFB to represent that Category. 10.11 In the event of a tied ballot, the Nomination Committee shall determine the winner of the ballot for the Category or Categories in which the vote has been tied. 10.12 The Club will announce the results of the election on fansboard.rangers.co.uk and http://www.rangers.co.uk within 48 hours after the ballot closes, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practicable. 10.13 The Club will, where reasonably practicable, intimate the outcome of the Election to all candidates prior to publication of the results on fansboard.rangers.co.uk and http://www.rangers.co.uk. From memory I received two emails encouraging me to vote.
  14. Right, sorry, I miss-read that as correct result then FGS; apologies.
  15. Under the new rules shouldn't I be top of the 3 with 42 pts vecause of 4 correct FGS i.e. 15th? Got to scrape for anything I can get after my VOID
  16. And a very nice person, who took great care of a disabled young lady I got into a match.
  17. You can put the real names to faces as well, another big dinner plus - I supply dual name sticky lables
  18. He had his last hurrah in Malmo, thanks but no thanks, Majid.
  19. I can position you at the other end of the table, near the door if that helps, and will PM the bank details so you've no excuses.
  20. He fires blanks; it's your heavyweights I'd be more worried about
  21. Obviously a deliberate error to keep T4C on his toes; but well spotted Christine. I must admit that I did have to do a double take on that because clearly I AM Alan; but when I realised that you had deliberately omitted the quotation marks - Don't you mean "you're" Alan? it made a lot more sense!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.