Jump to content

 

 

Dragonfly Trumpeter

  • Posts

    577
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dragonfly Trumpeter

  1. At least he apologised for betting on us not to win a game. That should keep many on here happy.
  2. I am not being cynical at all. Which part of 'illegal' do you not get anyway? Even worse than simply breaking the rules non stop, as a Rangers player he bet on Rangers games. But I suppose the lawsuit will be brought against the press shortly for suggesting that he be on us not to win one of them.
  3. Some on here are not bears, so you are never sure. But then again, you know that. Black broke every rule in the book and is in breach if his contract. Bet on football, though it is not allowed, even bet on games involving his own team and also, as a Rangers player, he bet on us not to win a game. Unless he is kept as non football staff and repaints Ibrox etc he should go.
  4. We will all know the 'real' truth later today after the McColl group statement and their meeting with the fans direct.
  5. Maybe that is what the meeting is for tomorrow. Murray and McColl will pick their superhero puppet once they have had their cosy wee coffee and cake session with the invited supporters. Mushrooms should not concern themselves.
  6. Which game are you talking about? We should maybe give him a pay rise then.
  7. If he bet on us not to win a game, his contract should be terminated. Immediately.
  8. Love him? Lol, steady on old chap and I apologise if my post gave you the wrong idea. If I get as far as being on my knees in front of him for 6 months imagining he has a green dick and Rangersitis though, I will let you know:laugh: See, I just take things as I see them. I know who and what Paul Murray is and what he has put in to Rangers, that is all. I doubt the staunch chap has put in as much in his lifetime.
  9. Resorting to personal abuse of people and circumstances you do not know whilst praising yourself as a staunch uber fan kind of blows your arguments in this thread out of the water. You are so far off the mark with Paul Murray, what he is in a Rangers context and what he has invested in Rangers over the years.
  10. Mini? Considering your non stop hero worship of Green - probably the worst thing ever to happen to our club - perhaps you should refrain from name calling others.
  11. All Paul Murray did when he was on the board was use his financial and business capabilities to reduce the debt to £15m, watch Rangers win titles even with the financial restraints, do all he could to prevent the club being shafted and tell David Murray in no uncertain terms how big a mistake he was making. Having seen the ridicule he was subjected to for attempting to keep DM liable for his actions then read the euphoria regarding Whyte then Green and the subsequent carnage, I am not surprised how some hate Paul Murray and want him crucified. It beggars belief. Then again, the Zeus mob are perhaps bluenoses with the best interests of Rangers FC at heart after all. Given that Whyte picked them.
  12. dB, do you class the teachers pet - our club Captain, a first pick, a hugely experienced player and a big earner from our club - as a stand in centre half? I know he is crap wherever he plays, was done a couple of years ago and only stayed on because of the big salary he was on, but I feel that is a feeble excuse for losing to the part time minnows.
  13. A different game from the one I saw then. Played them off the park, but lost to a stack of excuses. Wow. The janitor had a good game though. If only schools had no summer holidays and were in on a saturday as well.
  14. Bank rolling what? It is merely a group of shareholders (presumably over 25% of the company) wanting change, therefore asking for an egm and subsequent vote.
  15. There is a reason I don't post about astro physics. But I don't give a shit if you decide to change and utilise such careful considerations in the future or not, relax:)
  16. Okay, I thought you posted "he can't be a director anyway, with the insolvency rules". So I asked which rule. Sorry.
  17. Patronising? You said PM surely can't be a director anyway, with the insolvency rules. Now it is hazy and hypothetical? Back up what you posted initially.
  18. Okay, thanks. I never realised that being a director of a company during the 3 years prior to it going insolvent meant you can't be a director of another company thereafter. For how long a period? Must keep up to date with my insolvency education.
  19. Okay. Which companies has he been on the board of when they suffered an insolvency event?
  20. stb, why can't PM be a director anyway, with the insolvency rules?
  21. I felt personally addressed because, without question, you replied directly to my first 2 posts in this thread. Each time, seemingly, to defend someone against 'lying' accusations. And that is why I already asked you, which allegation(s) of lying did I make that warranted the response(s) you gave to my posts?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.