RANGERRAB

maybe he's ex-club captain now. who knows?

They're no longer needed & all three should be encouraged to leave. Harsh but true.

at long last someone talking sense. Obviously saw what I saw sitting the SJ rear stand. Broadfoot is a cheat & must be dealt with by the CO

before sacking any manager a club should always have a replacement lined up

Why? Hertz are gash

If McCall had got the job after Ally we'd still be in the championship just now

Anyone stamps on me 3 or 4 times & I'd react. Like Jack did

Broadfoot the cheat. Let's hope the CO does his job & hands him a lengthy ban

Because he was awful . Just two goals to his name this season. Garbage

The penalty got awarded. The referee failed to deal with the Kilmarnock players reaction & provocation thereafter.

Rangers are 1-0 up with a minute to go and get a penalty. Broadfoot doesn't like it & provokes Jack. Then he falls to the floor. Broadfoot is a cheat. Even Lego muncher wouldn't stoop this low

KIllie had come right into the game at the end. Broadfoot then gives away a penalty. So he takes out his frustration by provoking Jack. The guillible referee & his assistants fall for it. And BTW what was the delay for in taking the spot kick ? At one point we had a number off Kilmarnock players in their penalty box. What was all that about. The referee failed to deal with the Kimarnock players reaction to the penalty

Anyway I'm sure the Compliance Officer will sort this out. We'll appeal Jack's red card & all will be fine

Provocation. Then he falls to the floor. Broadfoot is a cheat. Jack never touched him.

Broadfoot provoked Jack by stamping on him. Jack pushed him & Broadfoot fell to the floor as if he'd been decked by Anthony Joshua. Broadfoot is a cheat who got a man sent off

Apparently Broadfoot stamping or attempting to stamp on Jack is Ok. Conveniently missed by the referee & his assistants.

Or get a man sent off by an incompetent referee

And should continue to do so. We need better quality than SPL players

Moult & Alves were either both guilty or not guilty. Only Alves gets charged. Why? Moult's booking was unrelated to the Alves incident

The whole thing is a farce because both players(Alves & Moult) were guilty at the incident. One is getting punished while the other isn't. Moult got booked for an incident involving Herrera at the same time which had nothing to do with Alves. The Compliance Officer has screwed up big time here. Let's unleash the dogs of war and get him...

This needs to be mentioned at the Alves appeal

Presumably they voted for themselves?

Of course they did. But the creation of the position of Compliance Officer has taken things to a whole new level. Will we ever see someone who isn't a yahoo as Compliance Officer? And why does this position get offered to someone with no footballing background when it concerns incidents in games missed or wrongly judged by the referee? This needs to be challenged by Rangers. Vigorously.

Is anyone seriously surprised by this ? Since the Compliance Officer position was created at the SFA it has been filled by a yahoo looking after the interests of the yahoos first & foremost and to penalise us at every opportunity. And they don't hide this anymore. It is blatant bias. The Rangers statement is fine and well but needs to address the position of Compliance Officer & who is occupying the role.

So who's his replacement then ? Will we go for the dream team of Miller, Jig & Boyd ? That's my biggest fear believe me