RANGERRAB
-
Posts
13,612 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Everything posted by RANGERRAB
-
couldnt agree more
-
LOL. Do you think they'd have accepted 'a more realistic salary' ? They're lining their pockets before they go (as they're entitled to do)
-
I don't think the board had the balls to get rid off McCoist and his staff. I think they were hoping he'd get us back to the top division and then leave voluntarily as a hero for taking us back up there. It hasn't worked out though has it?
-
We can't afford to hire a new manager(and his staff too presumably) whilst the present incumbents still drawing their lucrative salaries whilst working their notices
-
We don't/didn't have the money to pay them off due to the onerous contracts they are on. That's why McCoist is on gardening leave & McDowall is hanging around the dug-out
-
The contract was given to him by the previous board on oldco. It was TUPE'd over in 2012. Understand? With the benefit of hindsight the three amigos(Ally, McDowall & Durrant) should have been served their notice long ago. They weren't up to the task but the current board wrongly stuck by them probably in case it caused a backlash and the likes of Graham & Houstoun crawled out of the woodwork arranging more protests & boycotts
-
Acceptable manner ? There was no choice. We can't run Rangers on the consent of a caretaker manager working his notice who doesn't want to be there. Believe me, these players are much better than what we've got. To get promotion something drastic had to be done
-
You're missing the point(s). We would struggle to get promoted with the current squad & manager who doesn't want to be there. Something had to happen to give us a better chance of promotion.
-
The current board didn't give him his contract. It was TUPE'd over in 2012.It would have been Martin Bain probably
-
He'd be better doing that than football management that's for sure.
-
I'd be absolutely amazed if they weren't better than the unmotivated dross we've currently got most of whose contracts are up at the end of the season anyway
-
With better player players than the ones we've already got?
-
Not making a case for/against the board but they want us promoted back to top division. Every Rangers supporter should want that IMO. Don't you?
-
perhaps a vote of no confidence in the first team management as well?
-
The board are meddling in team matters because the football management are perceived to be failing in their primary objective i.e. getting Rangers promoted back to the top division. We can debate all day whether they're correct to do that or not
-
'Project Ally' has been an abject failure. People need to realise that. Drastic action was needed if we're to get promoted. Hence these 5 loan signings
-
Another like McCoist who has absolutely no hope of ever getting the same salary elsewhere.
-
Formation ? LOL. He doesn't know anything except the tried & failed 4-4-2 which just about every other manager in the division knows how to play against
-
That's a fair point. Call me a cynic but do they not seem to accept lower bids for their players from Celt*c than us ? Armstrong still had 18 months on his contract.
-
There is no political will to challenge this vile club and its grotesque support.
-
So do you think we'd get promoted with what we have we have? Or would you rather not get promoted?
-
I bet DK wants us promoted to the top division just as much as anyone. We're losing too much money not being there
-
so how do we get promoted then ? Don't you want to get promoted ?
-
Wonder why they didn't try to stop these 5 loan signings then? I genuinely thought they would.
-
More than just a club - more than just a scandal
RANGERRAB replied to D'Artagnan's topic in Rangers Chat
Alex Salmond did try to intervene regards the Rangers BTC was got told where to go as it was nothing to do with him. At the time I thought it rather strange that the top politician in Scotland got rebuffed in such a rude manner. Was there something HMRC wanted to hide?