Jump to content

 

 

trublusince1982

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,660

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by trublusince1982

  1. trublusince1982
    it keeps the club we love alive while we fight on other fronts. The death of Rangers should be avoided at all costs surely? Is that not a given? Personally nobody will make me surrender and kill off my club and then act like that is a victory.
  2. trublusince1982
    think Frankie is trying to cheer us up with a laugh!
  3. trublusince1982
    would it not be far better to fight for the club first before giving in and starting a fresh?
  4. trublusince1982
    a new rangers with no badge,strip, stadium,name, merchandise rights or history is not Rangers no matter how much we would want it to be. Personally think Ashley would preempt and take the rights for badges and any assorted merchandise rights before admin was through. Same with stadium etc there would be no more than a 50/50 chance of attaining any of the assets or rights. The only way is to fight smarter.
  5. trublusince1982
    show me a way to achieve that. Admin guarantees nothing. How will you ensure SD does not get control after any admin process, and are you sure the merchandise contract does not have provisions for such an instance? good options are none and are not really the point good out comes should be the parameter of our options. With people like these they give not a s**t for what harm they cause they only care about their egos/standing and their pockets. Those are their soft spots.
  6. trublusince1982
    at some stage we do have to admit boycotting games achieves nothing. That's boycotting mind not to be confused with customers choosing to not spend their hard earned going to games. the best boycotting can hope to achieve is administration and a 50/50 shot at the very best of then picking up the pieces, far more likely the same incumbents would get in there again. A huge gamble. Fail to see any other gain for the club bit like cutting off your nose to spite your face. Just my opinion.
  7. trublusince1982
    who does somers represent again shareholder wise? at least we can determine that whoever it is they are definitely against the clubs best interest.
  8. trublusince1982
    doubt frankie would want me to answer that on here. all i would say is there is more than one way to skin a cat.
  9. trublusince1982
    it is your club don't let it be taken from you.
  10. trublusince1982
    why would we court further involvement from one of those erroneous contract beneficiaries then?
  11. trublusince1982
    how many were interviewed? 0
  12. trublusince1982
    His comments show he is the wrong person for the job all on their own.
  13. trublusince1982
    here we go
  14. trublusince1982
    no not quite right, it was because he didn't do proper due diligence during takeover and all the historical finance agreements had stipulations in place saying they must be paid in full when the club was sold. Ashley had no other option but to take on the debt and takes money from the tv deal each year to pay it off. Think it was the first £15m he took last year. The myth of no interest was blown open when during fans meetings they said the free advertising round the stadium was in lieu of. Either way they pay it still to this day.
  15. trublusince1982
    £129m in debt is good?
  16. trublusince1982
  17. trublusince1982
    is it just me that sees Irvine in comments like that?
  18. trublusince1982
    for me Green was an employee of the raper utilized to facilitate the "functional victim" part as you call it. Why else would he make the largest return from Green being in charge? why else would someone approach green ask him to front a consortium, front the money then sit back and watch as green gives Ashley the keys to the vault for zero? If it looks like a rose, smells like a rose..........
  19. trublusince1982
    has the pantomime began yet?
  20. trublusince1982
    continuation of old all they do is sack or move on the puppets.
  21. trublusince1982
    hope you have your phone out then Frankie, full video please!
  22. trublusince1982
    He's a different Evil than Whyte, Green your words, took it from them you meant he is a different commodity.
  23. trublusince1982
    have seen paper aeroplanes make it that far....
  24. trublusince1982
    most of they questions I could tell you their answers right now, most have already been covered by their spin machine with full deflection in place. They need to be far more pointed than that. 1. How does the board plan to increase turnover and reduce costs to enable Rangers to operate in future without the need for emergency loans? With cost cutting already underway mentioned in the media and closer relations with fans through aspects like the fans board. Share issue if resolution is passed. Hope cost cutting indicates to present shareholders and London blah blah blah 2. Can the board explain fully the terms of its merchandise agreement with Sports Direct, in particular the latest financial figures that appear to show Rangers receiving just 75 pence from every £10 spent? will hide behind aim and then wax lyrical about how good it is with future mystery payments due 3. What, if anything, did Rangers provide to Mike Ashley Holdings (MASH) for waiving their rights to naming the stadium? nothing, was done from the goodness of his heart 4. What is the Rangers defence to the SFA allegation of Ashley’s dual interest, especially if he increases his shareholding? will fight sabre rattling only holds 10% at this point. Why would for the good of the game the sfa block it..... 5. What do the Rangers board understand to be MASH’s long-term vision for the club? same as boards, to continue our great partnership which benefits both parties blah blah blah 6. If the board knew £8million was needed to see out the season, why did they not engage further with Dave King over his proposed investment? no proof of cash or names behind bid with recent media coverage from south africa proving them right...... 7. Does the board envisage any scenario in the next 12 months in which its assets – Ibrox, Murray Park, Albion Car Park and Edmiston House – are sold to pay off debts? not in plans at this point as stated before. 8. How does the board plan to re-establish trust with the fan base, particularly those who have already disengaged? fans board, transparency............ 9. There are 12 players out of contract in the summer. What are the plans for player recruitment and retention from January? youth and contracts will be assessed on an on going basis after the agm and future fund raising will give clearer indications. 10. When will the club seek to replace McCoist and what will be the remit of the new manager? end of season happy with mcdowall at this point he knows the club well and is due his shot, have faith blah blah blah. Will enter a rigorous interview process to find best candidate
  25. trublusince1982
    Don't that's not funny If it comes true i will blame myself now!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.