Jump to content

 

 

SteveC

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,389

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by SteveC

  1. SteveC
    We can hardly keep from ripping each other to bits far less finding any solutions.
  2. SteveC
    A good question. In the interests of staying polite I won't say stark, raving bonkers.....
  3. SteveC
    When though? he can't be voted in tomorrow, can he? (please say "yes he can" )
  4. SteveC
    no probs, I should have been specific - I meant immediately, as in tomorrow
  5. SteveC
    No, Paul Murray - he's asking for Paul Murray to be invited on
  6. SteveC
    It's hopeless, wouldn't matter if he was on the board. Would just be outvoted like MM and Walter. Two were no good, why would one be?
  7. SteveC
    Nerves jangling here, so desperate for good news, so frightened that it won't be... that was to the first version Frankie posted, that a statement was forthcoming.
  8. SteveC
    The board's statement reads exactly like a typical politician/journalist double bluff. leak, get accused, demand apology, muddy the water, playe the victim..the "as if we would do such a thing" is beyond effing parody. "integrity" ffs after all they have got up to?!
  9. SteveC
    but these people never go away, they resurface with new username time after time
  10. SteveC
    Possibly though how anyone can perceive what is happening as anything other than a disgrace and what should be happening as crystal clear is baffling. Spivs and gangsters in suits out. Rangers men who support transparency and fan representation in. A return to a club to be proud of, fans interested only in supporting and defending the club and not attacking each other. It's not as though we didn't have enemies inside and outside Ibrox already. We've a lot to do before we can even think abut the football side again, and then we've a lot to do there. This should have been a period away from you know who where we could build from the grassroots up, encourage youth, a club style, plan for the future and return to the top refreshed and renewed. Instead.....................
  11. SteveC
    It'd never get published/released, would seem too fantastical - sadly we are way beyond satire, as is our beloved club. btw who is "ED"...oh wait, no - I don't want to know
  12. SteveC
    I wasn't having a go at your post, pal - it is just that the opening sentence was "I can confirm you're full of shit." which came almost straight after Frankie's post (324) ticking me off for replying to crucible (in a somewhat less direct manner) and Frankie asking for an end to personal stuff. It was just a funny juxtaposition - I tried to make it clear I was talking at a side issue to your main point which was, of course, a serious one.
  13. SteveC
    I know it's a serious topic and I thank you for your insight from an office bearer's position....but I have to say your opening sentence made me laugh out loud coming so soon after post 324
  14. SteveC
    is there an alternative universe where Rangers fans' get nothing but good news?
  15. SteveC
    Apologies, it's hard not to return a "nibble" with a "bite" in such a testing week. I've always found ignore pretty useless as you see the comments quoted by others anyway but I'll try that in future or at least "bite my typing fingers". It doesn't feel like Christmas is coming, but a merry one to you all. I've really liked this board this year, it feels (or at least used to!) like an oasis of relative calm compared to the others. I apologise for getting caught up in anything that would disturb that calm. I'll keep off the volatile threads.
  16. SteveC
    Yeah, because you are so deep and profound; not at all the transparent type,eh?
  17. SteveC
    In a morning filled with posts making astonishing and barely credible claims, this still stands out as a cracker to post on a forum about RFC.
  18. SteveC
    Under 20s won 2-0 at Dunfemline tonight. Murdoch and Gallacher scoring Eeam: Kelly; Halkett, Gibson, Gasparotto, Sinnamon; Murdoch, Telfer, Ramsay; McKay, Gallagher, Stoney. Subs: Smith, Mills, Wilson, Ogen, Hardie
  19. SteveC
    I don't think they are a great team either but I think we'd need to spend a lot more than 20 Million because: 1) they will spend when we get back 2) 20 million if it includes wages is not many players 3) lets, say, we get 5 players in for 20 million - how many will make it? What's the average for players coming in being a success at Rangers? What's the ratio under Ally? To get a handful of players that would actually settle and do well would cost a lot more than 20million. Meanwhile our enemies will strengthen every time we do/try to. It's probably all moot now anyway given what we are being told re the vote. A long run of even more cracks at getting group stage money for the mendicants. It's a disgrace
  20. SteveC
    "imran gers" was hardly subtle in the first place!
  21. SteveC
    eh? How could private e-mails be in the public domain? Business e-mails, e-mails to one's wife and (many) mistresses (sorry, thinking of politicians who lecture us on "family values") etc. etc. Would you say the same re snail mail letters, telephone calls, faxes?
  22. SteveC
    who would buy? Why would they dilute the already diluted share value? I ask because I have no knowledge of such things
  23. SteveC
    Thanks Frankie and of course, I agree.............................
  24. SteveC
    Probably yes, definitely no or at least not truthfully, e.g 1. "Chris Morgan..."
  25. SteveC
    I think he said that "I was told (at the beginning - in context of his quote) they were rich Arabs who wanted their names to be kept private". That is very different from him thinking they are, I am pretty sure he does not think they are, nor do I.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.