CammyF

Sorry, its not down to bottle, it's down to ability. They have more players who have it.

Nevermind, we play better in these games with 10 mem 🤔

As almost as inevitable as them scoring first, then us gifting them a 2nd, we start playing and get a goal back. Can't expect to win many games, especially OF games giving them 2 goals of a start.

We are an absolute laughing stock and not just on the pitch. Years of failure with only 1 brief bright light.

Acht well, it was inevitable. There's always next season, or rhe next after that, or the next after that.

As expected, no Sima, Matando or Balogun

Off course it's a gamble - after a prolonged lay off he is not match fit. Also, what of he breaks down after 10mins and is out for the remainder of the season?

Yilmaz has played 10 mins in the last 6 or so weeks. Huge gamble starting him in a game where we know they'll come out the traps flying. CH pairing of Davies and Souttar gives me nightmares. No wide players which means we will rely on Tav and whoever plays LB to get the service to Dessers. Thus will leave us exposed to Celtics wide players. I have a horrible, horrible feeling about tomorrow.

Stoke reject firing Real Madrid to CL Final?

In that scenario I'd much prefer Willie Collum awarded the penalty and it was confirmed via VAR. That's what he's paid to do.

We've been over-ran in the midfield in recent OF games, also gives cover to the full-backs and centre defenders. No reason we can't change it up later in the game. Everyone knows they'll come flying out the traps and try to build a lead. Hearing Matondo is back in training and aiming to play some part of Saturday and Sima back in individual training......

Has to be Sterling, Diomande and Lundstram in midfield.

Reflecting back on yesterday's game, I had a wee chuckle to myself regarding the "drop ball" incident in 1st half. Don't know who was more confused, the Rangers players, the Killie players, the ref or the fans 🤔 😀 Before anyone jumps in, not a dig at Dickinson, just a funny incident (was raging at the time tho!). Oh here's something for the lurkers, hearing Dickinsons old man helps run a RSC bus......

No, your changing the narrative. OK if they aren't missing them, why aren't they awarding them? That's the correct process. If a referee thinks it's a penalty, they award it. If they are wrong, it'll be overturned. If they aren't missing them, why aren't they not missing them in other games and waiting on VAR to "confirm'? You're tying yourself in knots on this.

What's confused you? Both stats are correct - out of our last 15 pens, only 3 have been given by on field referee and the last 11 given by VAR. I know it's a bank holiday Monday, but come on.....

Off course it's the correct decision in the end but why are on-field referees missing 11 consecutive penalties for Rangers? Or as you claim, are they missing the same amount for other clubs? If not, why not? It can't simply be down to relying on VAR unless you can show me any other team who have their last 11 pens awards via VAR and not on-field ref.

I've backed up my claim - 3 of our last 15 pens have been awarded by VAR. That's the only claim I made. You countered by saying that it happens everywhere, but can't prove that. All I asked was can you prove another club has had to rely on VAR to be awarded 11 consecutive penalties.

Has one team had anywhere near 11?

So you've made a claim based on conjecture?

You've made a huge jump to a incorrect conclusion (again). Where did I mention masonic or anti-Rangegs conspiracy? There is factual evidence that referees (for whatever reasons) are getting 4 out of 5 penalty decisions for Rangers wrong. The facts are there, black and white - last 15 penalties, only 3 given on the field. I asked you to substantiate your claim that this is happening "everywhere VAR is used" yesterday, but you chose to sidestep. I'll ask again, name me one other club where they have had their last 11 penalties given by VAR and not the onfield referee. If its happening everywhere, it shouldn't take you long to find.

Given that even if we do somehow win the league, we'll do so with LESS points than we managed last season finishing a poor 2nd, tells you the we have regressed slightly but they have regressed dramatically (and we still can't beat them)

Just reading that out of our last 15 penalties, only 3 have been awarded by the on-field referee. That's 1 in 5, or flipping it, 4 out of 5 times the on-field referee has gotten the decision wrong. I'm sure there's a perfectly innocent explanation for it though.

Thought Silva had a good game, was our most dangerous player in 1st half and scored the important equaliser. I've voted for Lundstram as in my opinion he was the one player driving us forward all game.

You missed the statement he made, then doubled down on regarding the fake video that was doing the rounds when we won 55.

Looking for a move 🤔😀