-
Posts
12,625 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Super_Ally
-
Aye, I hate success too. :box:
- 72 replies
-
- rangers
- match preview
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
You'll maybe notice over time I'm definitely not one of the moany bassas. It's a growing club on here though. :fish:
- 72 replies
-
- rangers
- match preview
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
B'Ham fans views: http://www.smallheathalliance.com/read.php?1,84440 Fergie getting high praise (mostly).
-
Worked for Monkeyheid at WBA!
-
Is half of Hampden not more than the capacity of Tynecastle though? Should these "extra" fans miss out?
-
Nothing premature about saying he was 3rd in the rankings when he was 3rd in the rankings. Merely a statement of fact. Had I said he was likely to win it however......
-
Could be a good move for Gow. Could see him succeeding there.
-
I was trying to be modest there. And there's no chance of me affording a Bentley nor finding anything on a map.
-
To be televised by Sky on the 19th. �£13 for adults, �£3 for kids. Not bad from the club.
-
I was always reasonably bright at school Cal, but I hated Geography and hence paid no attention. That' my excuse. The only other time I heard of Malawi was the thing Frankie advertised on here.
-
Ha ha, I dunno. "We paid for your boots"
-
I'm trying to help him here but he just wont stop.
-
Who doe he play for? I wouldn't have even heard of Malawi had my wee brothers school not had a charity event for them.
-
No, no they're not. Smith is more succesful as shown by the trophy count. Nice try but you're just looking foolish now. I have never denied Eck has a better win percentage. But Smith has been the more succesful Rangers manager.
-
Hamilton 3 - 3 Rangers: Player Ratings and MoM Poll
Super_Ally replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
I didn't think he was great by any stretch in what was another poor team performance. But from what I saw of the game he looked positive and that wee bit of confidence often posessed by youth. -
I don't think the big issue here is about Lafferty's ability compared to ridiculous, who by all accounts was a good player who didn't make the most of his talent. The issue is about Ridiculous being a terrible, incompetent, bias pundit with no professionalism nor insights on a game he should be an expert in. Charlie is one of, if not the worst, pundits on tv and yet somehow gets work on sky. Mind you they employ a lot of people who struggle with the English language like Paul Merson. It is not just because he's a rabid one (though it does account for many of his issues in bias and a lack of professionalism) but he is a terribly piss poor pundit and has no right to be commenting on anyone else competency for their position. Also this faux outrage at a poor tackle is ridiculous. If it was perpetrated by one of his beloved he would take the opposite stance. If it was not in a game involving the OF he wouldn't even comment. Yet he has to make ridiculous, ott announcements because it was a bear. Ridiculous is a massive fud and no one cares what he has to say. So why do the media allow this muppet a platform?
-
No chance do the mhankies not lead us in the Scottish Cup count.
-
Hamilton 3 - 3 Rangers: Player Ratings and MoM Poll
Super_Ally replied to Frankie's topic in Rangers Chat
Would have to plump for Miller too for much the same reason. Did not watch the game undisturbed (and without commentary) as was supposed to be working so my views are less valid than others however; I thought Little looked bright. First real view of him after the disappointment of his Old Firm debut being cut short. He looks confident and wasn't afraid to have a go. Re: McGregor. I know many like to call him a flapper. I don't think he's that bad and has improved coming for balls, but think he could improve still further. That said, do people think Hamilton looked at the Fortune furore and thought the ref may have been cowed in allowing them to take liberties. Time and again Mensing and others just jumped straight at McGregor, no attempt to play the ball. Yet no doubt too many of our fans would blame him for being "weak". He has got to be a bit more confident and aggressive but I don't think he's a flapper, I think many don't understand there are times when it is better to punch and I also think he is fouled an awful lot as people have identified this as his weakness. Hurlock, regarding the Weir slip, an Arsenal player (Denilson?) also fell (due to injury though) yet was not punished as the Everton player clean through did not take the chance. Football is a game of fine margins. -
I pointed this out to him immediately and yet he laughably tried to claim he wasn't being selective with his stats. I specifically mentioned trophies won yet he jsut plain ignored it as it doesn't fit with his wind up merchant agenda.
-
He came off early, which will hopefully help. And he did manage to walk off. Hopefully he isn't too bad. Agree Davis should be fine in a couple of days tops.
-
Is that not only when they're celebrating? :devil: It doesn't feel right wanting one of our players to fail, I doubt Madjid would like to think our fans had wanted him to get papped out. But if it boosts our SPL chances then I am happy. England must be pissing themselves. Another joke of a group at a major tournament. Someone name me a Malawi player?