Bill

Does that count as an attempt at piqued sarcasm? Are you Buster in disguise? OK genius, I’ll bite, you tell me how much Premier is paying Rangers? I can tell you how much goes to Rangers from a season subscription to RTV or on a pay-per-match basis. But first you might want to back up your mouth by showing everyone how much it costs to subscribe to Premier and how much of that goes to Rangers - otherwise you’re just another blowhard breaking wind.

In that case they won’t be contributing.

I hear you and agree but what we saw in first leg was no better than some of the opposition we’ll meet at home. We (the team) need to be confident of beating them or we’re wasting our time

Why would anyone contribute to outfits like Premier Sport instead of subscribing to RangersTV?

It seems the Croats mind games have got thru to us. I think we afford them too much credit and I’m confident we’ll roll them over.

We already have the basis of that infrastructure and what we don’t have is readily available at much more reasonable cost. Bottom line - the Rangers support knows how to find Rangers.

It amazes me that Rangers feels a need for a retail partner at all and certainly not at this particular time.

High Streets all over the country are dying because of outfits like Amazon. You no longer need shops to reach customers.

To not acknowledge Aberdeen’s achievements in recent seasons is to show the same disrespect we complain about receiving on a daily basis.

You should apply for a personality. There’s bound t be one available soon ?

The prospect of further boycotts and more spouting from that captain of industry at Son’s of Struth is depressing beyond measure. While we’re at it, who wants to volunteer for the “whaurs ra deeds?” role this time round?

Do you know something I'm actually going to agree with you too. There are umpteen ways that money could be used for the benefit of the club. Instead, they will continue pumping huge sums into shares that will progressively lose their value as further share issues take place. A 10.71% holding of 8,732,000 shares that's worth (say) £2.2m today will, in the event of a 50% dilution, need need a further investment of £2.2m just to stand still in terms of percentage holding. Where's the sense in that when the money could have been used to directly help club and supporters alike.

Then, in my humble and probably insignificant opinion, they should change that commitment forthwith because they're wasting good money in a heroic attempt to piss uphill.

Radio Scotland is strictly verboten chez moi too

Only two things remotely interest me about this matter. Whether Rangers will increase its merchandising income and by how much.

How about instead of buying more shares, the point of which is really no longer valid?

If that community council is representative of the people in the area then it will be unique. Community councils are unelected cliques of hand picked clones. They have a given right to lodge planning objections but the local planning committee is under no obligation to agree with them.

I feel sorry for people who deceive themselves by buying these rags or voting SNP while claiming to support Rangers. Self-deception is such a pitiful madness.

Saw this on Twitter - anyone know what’s going on?

That's been the best part of a day and haven't seem the problem again

I could live with that

Sangakara?

His delivery into the box was as consistent as it was effective. Exactly what we need but lack.

The best thing we could do is to take up none of our Parkhead allocation in September and in so doing challenge them to do the same at Ibrox. We don't need them but I suspect many of them would struggle to breathe without us.

The times they are a-changin