Gonzo79

It'd be helpul if we stuck to facts. I've seen a few posts mentioning the COs have yahoo affiliations but it lessens our case if there is no evidence. Of what? The press? The authorities? Our paranoid inclinations?

I mean living with a TV with a receiver is avoidable. You can get as much Rangers info and footage as you want without one. I'm getting to the stage of writing to the BBC and saying I'm just going to pay half because I'm being short changed. If they want to pay SNP nitwits and Rangers haters like Michael Stewart to analyse football then why should I pay his wages?

Their campaign is working. In addition to that, it's an encouragement for him to leave. Would you want to live and work in a country where you are constantly referred to as a nutjob, buffalo brains or a devil, despite being bloody good at your job. I certainly wouldn't. We'll get a £5m offer from a Championship side in the Summer and Morelos will be keen to get out of this yahoo driven goldfish bowl.

It's cool. 10 Hail Marys and he can get off with being a duplicitous twat.

It's becoming more of a fact than a thought.

I can see both points of view. If you have a TV with a receiver in it, you are bound to pay the licence fee. But it is avoidable in the modern world. I don't think it helps when Bears have a go at each other. It's not hard to be polite.

Michael Stewart.

'Strictly Do You Wanna Be In My Gang Hut' might be more appropriate, given the shared histories of the BBC and Separate Entity FC.

I hope Gerrard goes to the English press and asks them to look at the inconsistencies up here. This is becoming a joke.

Michael Stewart's primary function seems to be getting Rangers players in trouble. Sadly, he's doing a decent job on that front. See what happens when Scottish Nationalists get a pedestal.

Clare Whyte may as well get down on her knees in front of Lawwell in full public view. That's how obvious it all is. I bet Gerrard wonders what he's gotten himself into.

Club1872 have just issued a statement (I got an e-mail) advising Bears to get complaining.

I'm very happy with the result. Aberdeen are a diddy club though.

Loads of Bears have. Ofcom and BBC generic responses are aplenty. We need a more collective effort, otherwise nothing will change.

That's embarrassing. Aberdeen are diddy team - beating them should be run of the mill, at best.

This thread sums up why we won't get much done about it. Instead of collectively fighting the unfair reporting, we're sniping at each other. As an aside, Michael Stewart is a fud.

It'd be nice to win a game with the post-match analysis focusing on the football, rather than refereeing decisions.

Did anyone else think Jack was poor last night? He dodged out of at least two tackles.

I think the referee got all the major decisions spot on last night. They were both penalties and the red cards were deserved.

The Rangers win is/was sufficient.

I wish I was 21 again! Seriously though, three games without a win against the sheep is extremely disappointing. Hopefully we can rectify that this evening.

Is Graham unable to shed any light on this fresh dispute or is he just lying, as usual?

Milestone birthday for me today and all I want is a Rangers win. With the right attitude and team selection, it's not a lot to ask.

Michael Stewart is apparently sitting by his TV, desperately awaiting the kick off at Pittodrie, in order to find the next Rangers incident to work himself into a lather about. He's the 'pundit' to Phil McMadeupname's 'blogger' and Neil Lennon's 'manager'. Chris McLaughlin is often on conference calls with them and simply repeats...."My precious!". His wife takes down the minutes.

PQ CSC became a parody of themselves some time ago. It can be amusing at times, until you remember agenda-driven creeps like Michael Stewart are receiving public money to vent their frustration about Rangers. Never mind, Michael, you might get that SNP gig yet. They're running out of losers to put up for election.