Guest Dutchy Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 There certainly seems to be a case for some form of inquiry, hopefully followed by a naming and shaming and sacking. It may then display to these winkers that Rangers are not a club to trifled with. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted August 10, 2011 Share Posted August 10, 2011 With this leaked info, can't we send our lawyers out and harrass them for this ... and demand, say 2.7m in compensation? No really, what would any other company do if somesuch happens and see customers staying away, business partners look elsewhere and what have you? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,461 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Following on from what has already been posted. Craig,BD,or any other gersnet posters,is this normal practise for HMRC to go about their business publicly?,I mean even that BHEAST Philmcgobblegiver had all the info before it was in the rHags!!,which can only happen if someone from HMRC has given him this info,no?. There is something not quite right about all this,IMO. I could be wrong of course but it stinks big time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
djbroxybear 0 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Whyte was aware this tax bill was to be paid the question has to be asked why it hasn't. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Whyte was aware this tax bill was to be paid the question has to be asked why it hasn't. They are disputing the penalty added to it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 (edited) So I take it its �£2.8 plus �£1.4 , there seems top be different reporting in todays papers. Also SSN now reporting a deal has been reached with MHRC , no details though Edited August 11, 2011 by rbr 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,461 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Whyte was aware this tax bill was to be paid the question has to be asked why it hasn't. As far as I see it Rangers are not disputing the �£2.8m tax bill,it's the �£1.4m penalty fine they are disputing 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 There better be no details, else the confidentiality of those involved needs to be questioned. How do they come up with the penalty, I wonder? Must be some interesting interest involved ... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,461 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Am I correct in saying when this raised it's head that SDM agreed with CW that he would foot the bill????? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,356 Posted August 11, 2011 Share Posted August 11, 2011 Am I correct in saying when this raised it's head that SDM agreed with CW that he would foot the bill????? It was agreed that CW would foot the bill, and in return the purchase price of the club fell by �£6m. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.