Sandaza contract finally terminated in mutual agreement

[pete 2,499]

Obviously not, or else there would be no need for the mutual contract termination.

 

Also it was hardly the biggest crime in the world and didn't warrant that sort of action.

 

In the old days we would have said he is not Rangers class for doing what he done. I for one am glad he will never be allowed to pull on a Rangers shirt again. Green may have got it technically got it wrong in sacking him but it was morally totally correct in my eyes. I am happy I will never see him in a Rangers shirt again.

[chilledbear 16]

Reminded me of the way Whyte got rid of Bain.

 

Playing to the gallery, but amateurish at best.

 

Rangers should be better than this.

[rbr 1,247]

yet again everyone jumps to conclusions without knowing any facts , same old same old

[calscot 0]

Who needs Spiers et al when you have so many Rangers fans desperate to turn any story into an attack on the club. With the exception of actual negative stuff like sectarian behaviour by fans of course.

[Bluedell 5,366]

In the old days we would have said he is not Rangers class for doing what he done. I for one am glad he will never be allowed to pull on a Rangers shirt again. Green may have got it technically got it wrong in sacking him but it was morally totally correct in my eyes. I am happy I will never see him in a Rangers shirt again.

 

That's an OK approach to take if it was actually being applied. It wasn't a moralistic approach. Would Green have done it if it was Lee Wallace, for example? There's no way. Green only did it because Sandaza wasn't contributing much.

 

Sandaza's biggest crime was stupidity. Most players would be happy to do what Sandaza did but they would ensure it was in a controlled environment which menat that they would not get caught.

[simplythebest 0]

That's an OK approach to take if it was actually being applied. It wasn't a moralistic approach. Would Green have done it if it was Lee Wallace, for example? There's no way. Green only did it because Sandaza wasn't contributing much.

 

Sandaza's biggest crime was stupidity. Most players would be happy to do what Sandaza did but they would ensure it was in a controlled environment which menat that they would not get caught.

 

So what's the problem with yet another overpaid mercenary footballer being brought down a peg or two?

[calscot 0]

If nothing else, the hard line approach will make players think twice about talking to agents while under contract..

[the gunslinger 3,366]

clearly illegal and now its cost us money.

[chilledbear 16]

Who needs Spiers et al when you have so many Rangers fans desperate to turn any story into an attack on the club. With the exception of actual negative stuff like sectarian behaviour by fans of course.

 

Why don't you name the posters this is aimed at ?

[simplythebest 0]

clearly illegal and now its cost us money.

Worth it to get rid of him and make a point in my opinion.