der Berliner 3,246 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 (add: For the time being.) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I just don't believe this from BBC Scotland. The four would join the board at the request of the group of shareholders who have demanded an EGM in an attempt to remove chief executive Craig Mather, finance director Brian Stockbridge and non-executive director Bryan Smart. Murray and McLelland could be returning to the Ibrox board BBC Scotland understands that the four to be added would be former chairman John McLelland, former director Paul Murray, accountant Frank Blin and bus tycoon Sandy Easdale. So McCollco want Sandy Easdale on the Board !!!!!! I think we're all getting dizzy from the spinning. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I think we're all getting dizzy from the spinning. Not half. Instead of saying 'I don't believe this', I should have said 'I laughed when I read this'. Do we think the other side will say anything? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Not half. Instead of saying 'I don't believe this', I should have said 'I laughed when I read this'. Do we think the other side will say anything? I think if they don't then they just play into the incumbents hands. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 made me laugh amms. thanks, not many laughs to be had in this situation. A fight, no way, it would have to be Britain's next top male model contest 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 A fight, no way, it would have to be Britain's next top male model contest Ouch!...... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 So the easdales have bottled it and hope be giving in to murray and blin and adding in hitchcock they can not only stay on but add one. No doubt the next step will be to drop the other easdale who the sfa won't allow anyway. Pfffft. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 The Board could take on Blin, Murray and McLelland as Chairman and give up Smart and still have the majority, without Sandy Easdale. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I don't see why McCollCo have to say or do anything in reply to this crass leakage from the usual suspects. Everything that's happened since the requisition was made has been attempts at damage limitation/rapprochment by the current board. We'll accept this, we'll accept that, we'll leak this, we'll leak that...while I'd prefer McColl's side to stand firm and just get the leeches voted off, if it has to be piecemeal over a period of time then so be it. The absolutely vital thing is to get responsible individuals in to clean up the boardroom. Whether it's cleaned out beforehand or afterwards can be fought over later on, but we musn't lose sight of the objective: clean up the boardroom. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I don't see why McCollCo have to say or do anything in reply to this crass leakage from the usual suspects. Everything that's happened since the requisition was made has been attempts at damage limitation/rapprochment by the current board. We'll accept this, we'll accept that, we'll leak this, we'll leak that...while I'd prefer McColl's side to stand firm and just get the leeches voted off, if it has to be piecemeal over a period of time then so be it. The absolutely vital thing is to get responsible individuals in to clean up the boardroom. Whether it's cleaned out beforehand or afterwards can be fought over later on, but we musn't lose sight of the objective: clean up the boardroom. Are they all bringing in hoovers and dusters? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.