the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 You give Green quite a lot of hypothetical power here. I for one doubt that the Easdales are on the strings of anyone but themselves. Well I loled 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 GS seems more complementary about Charles than I am in a twisted sort of way When I say green I mean whatever malevolent force is bleeding us dry. Not necessarily green himself. He's probably just a well paid henchman. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 It's a likely to be Whyte at the top of the tree as green tbh 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Well, if you are a man like Prior (who has seen the figures), would you support a board and buy shares of a club that is, if we go by the media opinion, about to go bust? Obviously, he could just be another of these "SPIVS" looking to make a quick buck, for fun more than anything. When did he see the figures? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 It's a likely to be Whyte at the top of the tree as green tbh 1 million investigation said otherwise 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,058 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 1 million investigation said otherwise So you've seen the report then? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 So you've seen the report then? No I doubt any of us have, the findings were made pretty clear however through the media etc. You think Malcolm Murray wouldn't have shouted it from the rooftops if the report concluded Green was Whyte's mate? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,058 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 No I doubt any of us have, the findings were made pretty clear however through the media etc. You think Malcolm Murray wouldn't have shouted it from the rooftops if the report concluded Green was Whyte's mate? I'm sure when it finally gets leaked it will be found not to contain the exoneration you claim. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I'm sure when it finally gets leaked it will be found not to contain the exoneration you claim. Did the SFA, in the interest of proving that Whyte - whom they had previously banned as an individual who should not be involved with any team in Scottish football - had no connection with anyone at Rangers, request to see this report? Subsequently did they take no action? Surely this implies that there was no proven connection between Green and Whyte, otherwise they would have conducted their own investigation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,058 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Did the SFA, in the interest of proving that Whyte - whom they had previously banned as an individual who should not be involved with any team in Scottish football - had no connection with anyone at Rangers, request to see this report? Subsequently did they take no action? Surely this implies that there was no proven connection between Green and Whyte, otherwise they would have conducted their own investigation. I'm sure when it finally gets leaked it will be found not to contain the exoneration you claim. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.