the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 How's this then. If green sells our stadium to one of his mates we will never recover from his ownership. If he doesn't it will take 10 years to recover from it. Unless someone like dave king pumps in 20 to 40 million for little or no return. And that's 10 years from when he hands us over to owners who want to win trophies not get rich not from now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 i'm more fed up reading about his attempts do do so being blocked by greedy people. but it works out the same. Dave is from Castlemilk so he should know, if someone wont answer the front door, go round the back and break in the back door or climb in through a window. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Dave is from Castlemilk so he should know, if someone wont answer the front door, go round the back and break in the back door or climb in through a window. That's what he's doing with this article. Exactly what he's doing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
barca72 440 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 (edited) I'm sure when it finally gets leaked it will be found not to contain the exoneration you claim. Since you're sure, I guess we can be sure that you've seen the report, then? Edited February 10, 2014 by barca72 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Well, if you are a man like Prior (who has seen the figures), would you support a board and buy shares of a club that is, if we go by the media opinion, about to go bust? Obviously, he could just be another of these "SPIVS" looking to make a quick buck, for fun more than anything. I have absolutely no idea what his motives or intentions are, but I do find myself wondering about that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I am amazed that yet another article in the Sun full of nonsense such as " ‘If a sensible business and financial plan has been completed then Rangers may have gone forward, but there has been no communication of this at present." (obviously it won't be communicated till it's completed) and unsubstantiated "facts" such as ‘Clearly, the passage of time since the AGM has reduced the cash reserves to a critical level.’"; has managed to engender near 100 posts in 10 pages on here. Completely leaving aside the "fit & proper" issue, as several posters have said, if King wanted some real influence he could easily have snapped up a notifiable 3% or the 5% of the shares necessary to call an EGM, more than enough shares have been traded in the market. It would only have cost him around £750,000 tops, apparently pocket money to him; and still left him £19M and change (out of the alleged £20M he wants to invest directly into the Club). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Oh aye another egm for the spivs to win is what we need. Vert prductive 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 We need money and that's what he's offering. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,286 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Oh aye another egm for the spivs to win is what we need. Vert prductive Take a step back and check what BH wrote. Me too, BTW. He could have snapped up shares all along but did not. He could have had a vital say by buying shares long before the AGM but chose not to. For his own reasons. Add to that the baggage he has with the RSA folk. Money is all fine and if the clubs needs it, they will sure come back to him. Maybe we look upon the silence from the board from a more positive direction? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted February 10, 2014 Share Posted February 10, 2014 I am amazed that yet another article in the Sun full of nonsense such as " ‘If a sensible business and financial plan has been completed then Rangers may have gone forward, but there has been no communication of this at present." (obviously it won't be communicated till it's completed) and unsubstantiated "facts" such as ‘Clearly, the passage of time since the AGM has reduced the cash reserves to a critical level.’"; has managed to engender near 100 posts in 10 pages on here. Completely leaving aside the "fit & proper" issue, as several posters have said, if King wanted some real influence he could easily have snapped up a notifiable 3% or the 5% of the shares necessary to call an EGM, more than enough shares have been traded in the market. It would only have cost him around £750,000 tops, apparently pocket money to him; and still left him £19M and change (out of the alleged £20M he wants to invest directly into the Club). This is the bit I cannot understand. With the share price as it is why isn't he buying shares the way the likes of Laxey and Prior did ? Surely with his alleged wealth that would be loose change to him to gain even a 5% shareholding 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.