SteveC 150 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Deep down surely that is what every Bear wants to see and hear? Means there was nothing to worry about but the facts just don't stack up. Surely it is not? A half arsed compromise would leave the Spivs still steering the ship whither they wish and would consign us to even more years as also rans than we currently face. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,245 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Words It's only words. Nothing there that's legally binding. Come on folk ... you read "club statement" and the usual suspects (and no insult intended) start belittle and downgrade it in ways that makes you beggar belief. We have the same "only words" stuff from King, nothing "legally binding" and whatnot. Why is one good for him and not for the others? Maybe the board-haters should now that King and the board have spoken to one another stop using the eighty-eights for flak and revert to 20mm canons for the time being? NB: This is a general reply, not aimed at bluebear54 specifically. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 But king hasn't a track record of spivery that's the difference. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 But king hasn't a track record of spivery that's the difference. And King is a Rangers fan - none of them are. Not that being a fan makes you the best person for the job. makes you care more about what you are responsible for though, makes you less likely to torture it slowly to death merely for personal gain But, yes, the main - of various differences - is that they are on the board due to their connections with the Green and Whyte apocalypse that engulfed our club. On another thread someone complained re Green having f@ck all place in a thread about Sandy Easdale. Could hardly have a clearer place, surely. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 Surely it is not? A half arsed compromise would leave the Spivs still steering the ship whither they wish and would consign us to even more years as also rans than we currently face. What i meant was all Bears would surely want a solid board with the clubs best interests at heart and a shit load of ambition. Meaning the board were not spivs at all but decent honest men eager to make us number 1 in Scotland again and capable of competing in Europe. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,245 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 But king hasn't a track record of spivery that's the difference. But Wallace, Somers and Nash have, yes? Or whom do you think King was speaking to? NB and just asking: does anyone actually know whether everything King did with regard to his tax problems in the RSA would have been legally fine in Britain? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 But Wallace, Somers and Nash have, yes? Or whom do you think King was speaking to? NB and just asking: does anyone actually know whether everything King did with regard to his tax problems in the RSA would have been legally fine in Britain? New names same board. No expert but he would have been taken to tribunal here as well. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 While we're on Rangers fans on the board malcolm Murray was handing out leaflets outside the louder yesterday. That's the difference. We need rangers men running us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,245 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 New names same board. No expert but he would have been taken to tribunal here as well. I assume you do actually believe this? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 16, 2014 Share Posted March 16, 2014 I assume you do actually believe this? They have the proxy over the same shares so it's a fact. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.