pmu 0 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Aye but ally sitting there, staggered and justifying the money spent on team. The guy is so arrogant that he doesnt see that he has had his nose in the same trough as the boardroom leeches. He IS one of them. He basically backed everyone in the boardroom that kept on paying him his extortionate salary 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Your faith in me is touching. I can recognise a high level of intelligence when I see it GS even if we don't agree most of the time; that's why I am surprised at what I view as some quite flippant responses on this thread, not your usual style at all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,283 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Semantics aside, the spending of that money is staggering when we consider the same amounts may not be realised again. The waste disgusts me. We also have to remember that our accounts may not have talked about £70m losses but they did talk about the club only being a going concern via the season ticket levels being maintained (or modertaely increased). What happens if they go down? Thus, rather than worrying about PR, I'd much rather we addressed that more pressing question. Fully agree on the mis-spending bits. I'm concerned that he's on record speaking about losses here. It's essentially similar to the 134m debt being flung about a couple of years ago. It is not that 68m went totally unaccounted for or were indeed "losses". They were wasted and who knows how much went into dark channels. At this moment and time, the club surely does not need an employee speaking in this way though. BTW, we all, to a man (and women) want to know what happened to the money ... and if possible hold those accountable who let it happen. Right now, IMHO, the clubs primarily needs people who make sure that any such misspending ain't happen again and/or is being stopped. As far as I am concerned, the current board tries to do that. How successfully is anyone's guess. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 I can recognise a high level of intelligence when I see it GS even if we don't agree most of the time; that's why I am surprised at what I view as some quite flippant responses on this thread, not your usual style at all.GS is an intelligent guy even if misguided at times 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Fully agree on the mis-spending bits. I'm concerned that he's on record speaking about losses here. It's essentially similar to the 134m debt being flung about a couple of years ago. It is not that 68m went totally unaccounted for or were indeed "losses". They were wasted and who knows how much went into dark channels. At this moment and time, the club surely does not need an employee speaking in this way though. BTW, we all, to a man (and women) want to know what happened to the money ... and if possible hold those accountable who let it happen. Right now, IMHO, the clubs primarily needs people who make sure that any such misspending ain't happen again and/or is being stopped. As far as I am concerned, the current board tries to do that. How successfully is anyone's guess. the 134m debt was a debt which never was. The oldco got refused a CVA for whyte not paying over PAYE/NI. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 I can recognise a high level of intelligence when I see it GS even if we don't agree most of the time; that's why I am surprised at what I view as some quite flippant responses on this thread, not your usual style at all. I'm tired and making a point. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 GS is an intelligent guy even if misguided at times I'm a prophet. People should listen to me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pmu 0 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Oh well the only "prophet" associated with rangers in a long time lol 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 I'm a prophet. People should listen to me. When you get your promotion to Messiah, you can take the Dave King role, i would support you oh great and holy one lol. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 (edited) Back to the statement for a fleeting moment since it's no contest in Munich; King says: The board has conceded that it does not plan to effectively compete with Celtic in our first season back in the Premier League. but the Review actually says: The Board has set the following performance targets for re-establishing the Club in the SPFL Premiership: Season 2015/16 - Re-establishing the Club in the SPFL Premiership with a top two finish and the ability to challenge for the title So a question to Mr King: In what way does "a top two finish and the ability to challenge for the title" not equate to competing with Celtic? And a question for Gersneters: Apart from the dreaded split infinitive; does anyone hereabouts seriously think it's realistic to expect Rangers to compete with Celtic in our first season back in the SPL? Edited April 29, 2014 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.