BrahimHemdani 1 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 It would be better than what we have now but not really good enough. Dave knows that. More speculation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 One would hope so. A serious accusation has been made. Then anyone could make up any sort of random accusation just to stir up trouble, would hope the law isn't quite so simple 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 More speculation. Based in him saying he wouldn't do it and his assertion we need 50 million. A fair assumption imho. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Then anyone could make up any sort of random accusation just to stir up trouble, would hope the law isn't quite so simple Well they could. However we know for a fact Wallace mislead shareholders at the AGM. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Well they could. However we know for a fact Wallace mislead shareholders at the AGM.We really don't. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Same evidence rab has that King is poor and lying. Well now, I don't know about poor, but he IS a proven liar (at least according to the much criticised SA courts). 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,182 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 We've had similar investigation stuff before (remember the SFO stuff from last year). Usually they don't go all that far but the people named in them often become too toxic for retention. Same may well happen with Wallace but he'll just be replaced by someone else. At the end of the day, it's the people behind the appointments that King, Murray, Kamehameha or whoever need to remove. The only way this will happen is via cash and lots of it. In the meantime, doesn't matter if people renew or not, the numbers may not be big enough to save the club financially. As it stands Rangers Football Club is toxic and every fan will have to consider whether their input improves that situation or not. Sometimes you need to be cruel to be kind... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 We really don't. Oh but we do. We all heard him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Well now, I don't know about poor, but he IS a proven liar (at least according to the much criticised SA courts). Just holding a mirror up for rab. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted April 29, 2014 Share Posted April 29, 2014 Well they could. However we know for a fact Wallace mislead shareholders at the AGM. Isn't the issue with that whether he did so knowingly or not or perhaps even whether if he didn't know he ought to have known? BD said he was entitled to rely on the info provided to him by his Finance Director at the time and I agree with that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.