the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Fact is the club can't run on fresh air, so unless you seriously believe the board/owners are going to stop paying the bills then it's still vital working capital being put in The board have sworn under oath that that's not an issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 We've tried handing them copies amounts of cash. All that proved was they weren't to be trusted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 We've tried handing them copies amounts of cash. All that proved was they weren't to be trusted. They might have mismanaged it but Murray mismanaged our money for years when Advocaat came in. Frankly i've always seen it as giving money to the club not the board 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Fact is the club can't run on fresh air, so unless you seriously believe the board/owners are going to stop paying the bills then it's still vital working capital being put in Of course the club cannot run on fresh air, that is a fact as you say. But it also does it need £70 million for 18 months. Sorry, it seems that is also factual. That is the point, no need to point out it obviously needs money when you look at the shareholders actions. And I say that as someone who has contributed to their slush fund. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Of course the club cannot run on fresh air, that is a fact as you say. But it also does it need £70 million for 18 months. Sorry, it seems that is also factual. That is the point, no need to point out it obviously needs money when you look at the shareholders actions. And I say that as someone who has contributed to their slush fund. I'm not defending the 70 million figure by any means (nor has Wallace and co), but there's a fairly common scare line being put out that none of your money is going into the club if you buy a ST. That simply isn't true unless the board are going to stop paying our bills as I said. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 They might have mismanaged it but Murray mismanaged our money for years when Advocaat came in. Frankly i've always seen it as giving money to the club not the board Yes but Murray also put in 100 million. Dave king 20 for that matter. Murray also mismanaged it on kanchelskis and numan. Not sandaza and houses in France. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I'm not defending the 70 million figure by any means (nor has Wallace and co), but there's a fairly common scare line being put out that none of your money is going into the club if you buy a ST. That simply isn't true unless the board are going to stop paying our bills as I said. It's where it goes after it goes in that's the issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 They might have mismanaged it but Murray mismanaged our money for years when Advocaat came in. Frankly i've always seen it as giving money to the club not the board Everyone to their own but......... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sairdyy 0 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 We've reached a sad time where fans are saying something like this in response to potentially high ST sales You're right. I believe that we need to starve out the board/faceless investors asap. I accept the risks involved in this way of thinking, but to me they outweigh the status quo. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Fact is the club can't run on fresh air, so unless you seriously believe the board/owners are going to stop paying the bills then it's still vital working capital being put in Having sufficient monies to ensure that the club is able to run efficiently is a matter for the board(s). You continually get that arse about face. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.