Rangersitis 0 Posted October 24, 2014 Share Posted October 24, 2014 But then at least Nash was there now there's Tweedledum, Tweedledummer, Captain Mainwaring and the not so Admirable Crighton! I have always just assumed that Sandy was running the show. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 keith jackson @tedermeatballs 39s40 seconds agoI believe Mike Ashley has been threatening all sorts action if his package is not rubber-stamped. If Ashley wants a war, the way I'm feeling right now, he can have it. A one-off boycott with a near empty stadium is the next step and it would be a big deal for me personally to do that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted October 25, 2014 Author Share Posted October 25, 2014 Can anyone work out what might be going on? Who will be siding with Ashley and who with Kennedy? Is it true they must take the best offer? Can one or the other increase their offer if the voting is going against them? Anyone enlighten me 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Can anyone work out what might be going on? Who will be siding with Ashley and who with Kennedy? Is it true they must take the best offer? Can one or the other increase their offer if the voting is going against them? Anyone enlighten me Kennedy is doing King a favour. Easdale and co will be closer to Ashley as they have a common goal. If it comes to a bidding war, Ashley wins hands down as he can throw in a bit of blackmail. No inside info, all just pure guesswork. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mountain Bear 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Directors would leave themselves open to legal challenge if they accepted an obviously inferior offer, as that would be against the interests of shareholders (collectively). It's called their fiduciary duty. Anyone can alter their loan terms before the directors decide. It doesn't require shareholder approval. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted October 25, 2014 Author Share Posted October 25, 2014 Thanks folks, I'm just wondering why, if Ashley holds the upper hand, this wasn't settled last night. Why did Ashley not raise his offer, or could it be the strings attached make it inferior even if he raised it?? Think I'll go back to bed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 It is a nightmare I agree, but I do not see King or Kennedy in it for personal gain. King is a Bear who has his money made, even though some, mainly WizardBillMcMerlin (the ever hungry feeder at the red raw teat of Toxic Jack, that's when he can get in ahead of IRA lover and terminal Rangers hater Phil3names of course) and his lackeys would want to portray otherwise. Kennedy is also a self made man and I believe he wants to protect Rangers from further pillage. I think he recognises what a huge loss an even further diminished Rangers would be to Scottish and European football. Souness is in the background here surely. Ashley just wants OUR cash. Greed is good don't forget. Isn't it?? Wouldn't disagree with that mate. I'm not happy King's fucked off back to South Africa again when I'd rather he was in the trenches with supporters. I always mind 'the bunnet' camped outside the piggery rallying the filfth...and never backing down. Maybe social media's changed that need? I don't think it has. Kennedy's doing what he done in administration - half hearted bids. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 (edited) Wouldn't disagree with that mate. I'm not happy King's fucked off back to South Africa again when I'd rather he was in the trenches with supporters. I always mind 'the bunnet' camped outside the piggery rallying the filfth...and never backing down. Maybe social media's changed that need? I don't think it has. Kennedy's doing what he done in administration - half hearted bids. It all has a retro feel to it, with more than a hint of desperation thrown in. I really don't see Ashley and friends letting things slip from their grasp at this late stage. By the way, liked your article, mate. When is your club having it's 40th do next year? Edited October 25, 2014 by Rangersitis 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 There were over a .million shares traded yesterday also 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted October 25, 2014 Share Posted October 25, 2014 Does your heart tell you to blindly accept the asset strippers just because they wear Rangers ties? When are you going to wake up the "Berliner"? I take it such a silly remark will warm the hearts of some of my fellow "fans". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.