Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Irrelevant even before it's release due to Nash resignation.

 

I have been asked to make a personal comment on the rumour that the Rangers board is considering a loan from Mr Ashley. I don't see the offer of a short term loan by Mr Ashley affecting me in any way. Our offer is for a long term permanent solution that can take the club forward and unite the fans and the board for the first time in many years. The board is in the final stages of reviewing our offer and I expect a definitive answer early next week. Frankly, it doesn't seem possible that the board can do anything other than recommend it to shareholders given the dire financial circumstances and the fact that no other long term solution is on offer. Mr Ashley's involvement (and recently announced continued commitment) with Newcastle precludes him from making a similar offer of long term permanent equity.

 

What Mr Ashley can do is attempt to increase his vice-like grip on the Rangers brand by improving his retail position as a condition for supplying short term debt to tide the club over until our permanent funding is in place. But I know that there are other investors also willing to provide bridging finance. The board will therefore not have to accept punitive terms even if Ashley attempts to oppose them. We must remember that the board is ethically and legally bound to act in the best interest of the company and all shareholders. Ashley can not expect preferential treatment and will not get it. I am confident that Graham Wallace and Philip Nash have enough integrity and commercial experience to do the right thing.

 

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sdec2h

Link to post
Share on other sites

Irrelevant even before it's release due to Nash resignation.

 

I am confident that Graham Wallace and Philip Nash have enough integrity and commercial experience to do the right thing.

 

so nash bailed thinking "fuck this"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very disappointing news about Nash resigning because by all accounts he was one of the good guys and supposedly excellent at his job.

 

The board are probably caving in to Ashley's demands because they're desperately trying to avoid the EGM he requisitioned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very disappointing news about Nash resigning because by all accounts he was one of the good guys and supposedly excellent at his job.

 

The board are probably caving in to Ashley's demands because they're desperately trying to avoid the EGM he requisitioned.

 

If so, he must have been the only good guy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.