quattro 0 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Do we have any idea why the Herald is recycling a story from two years ago as news, it was previously King's threat to sue Murray for £20 million and was widely reported. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 Do we have any idea why the Herald is recycling a story from two years ago as news, it was previously King's threat to sue Murray for £20 million and was widely reported. because sdm has hit out at him in the press. one suspects things are moving forward with the claim and sdm is sweating. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 it most certainly would. because i suspect we could have made good on all debts assuming we win the big tax case in the end. in a proper administration. i.e. the oldco was never insolvent 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,236 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 i.e. the oldco was never insolvent ... and, IIRC, Paul Murray was saying our debt was 14m at the time Whyte stepped into the fray. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 i.e. the oldco was never insolvent oh it was insolvent al right thanks to whyte but that was allegedly fraudulent and it was retrievable. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 oh it was insolvent al right thanks to whyte but that was allegedly fraudulent and it was retrievable. And hopefully we will see the individuals in the organisations who enabled Whyte to acquire Rangers brought to justice instead of the four lackeys lifted last week 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 oh it was insolvent al right thanks to whyte but that was allegedly fraudulent and it was retrievable. I think you have to go back further and to the alleged threat from the bank (direct or via agent) that they would force insolvency if the CW deal wasn't signed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 I think you have to go back further and to the alleged threat from the bank (direct or via agent) that they would force insolvency if the CW deal wasn't signed. So why were LBG so keen for Whyte to get Rangers then? The Rangers bank debt was small beer compared to the MIH bank debt 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 So why were LBG so keen for Whyte to get Rangers then?The Rangers bank debt was small beer compared to the MIH bank debt money is money and 18 milllion is a lot. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted November 20, 2014 Share Posted November 20, 2014 So why were LBG so keen for Whyte to get Rangers then?The Rangers bank debt was small beer compared to the MIH bank debt 18M pounds sterling and what might have been coming down the road can't be considered "small beer". The Murray Group numbers were much greater but didn't seem to have such 'opportunities' and hence, you can't compare them in the way you seem to be doing,... apples and carrots. However, by hook or by crook, an opportunity was found at Ibrox and the bank would seem to have benifitted more than most from it's realisation. 'Follow the Money'................ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.