rbr 1,247 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 It is not really a matter of whether we like or dislike Ashley more what legal remedy may be available to him should Rangers be delisted and the possibility of this being detrimental Rangers. Sorry on my phone , that wasn't meant to be a thanks. Hopefully this causes Ashley some grief but probably not , I have been buying Rangers shares since before Souness, it made no difference then and will make no difference going forward , it's just another stick to batter us over the head with . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tannochsidebear 2,312 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 we'd need auditors to get a Nomad........I believe they resigned several months ago.....but it wasn't declared wonder why ? That doesnt make sense to me. If the Auditors resigned several months ago, the Nomad only resigned a few weeks ago, so we clearly dont need auditors in place to have the services of a Nomad. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 It is not really a matter of whether we like or dislike Ashley more what legal remedy may be available to him should Rangers be delisted and the possibility of this being detrimental Rangers. I just enjoyed seeing it written no matter what. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 You honestly believe that institutional investors are going to buy shares in Rangers after everything that has happened in the past? Good luck with that. if de-listed do you think anyone is going to buy shares ? good luck with that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 I am not holding myself out as an expert in this area but it's my understanding that share trading off any recognised stock exchange essentially would be by private bargain and I don't see that as helpful to a (hopefully) expanding company. Regulatory restrictions are there for a purpose one of which is to allow shareholders to complain if the said rules are broken. Yeah we've seen where complaints get us with the aim. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Yeah we've seen where complaints get us with the aim. We are certainly about to. No NOMAD will touch us with a bargepole. Grim days ahead 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 No honest on has touched us for years. B 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anchorman 0 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 (edited) If KingCo +T3B are willing and able to provide all the finance that Rangers require to meet the new 7 Year Plan which is several times the £10m or so that will be raised in the rights issue, then it would indeed be to his advantage to de-list but it is this suggestion that is at best futile and at worst delusional. You don't know that. You have no foundation for saying that. Another cheap snipe at King & Co when they are hardly in the door (granted you didn't want them in the door at all). In this regard, King is guilty of either a severe error of judgement or blatant deception in regard to the appointment of a NOMAD and the de-listing of the company if that should come to pass. Yet another cheap snipe at King & Co. Your language is the language of a bitter man towards them - GUILTY already eh? Give us a break and get over the fact that men who care for the Club are in for the long haul now. Not the type of men you supported, who WERE GUILTY of pulling off the 'Geordie Five' heist under our noses to the tune of £500K and more. You did speak of your admiration for Llambias right??? You my friend ARE GUILTY of a serious error of judgement. Edited April 2, 2015 by Anchorman 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 Where is Mr King anyway ? If we're about to be de-listed shouldn't he be over here instead of back in SA? If we're de-listed who is going to fund things going forward ? many, many more questions needing answers soon 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stewarty 1,876 Posted April 2, 2015 Share Posted April 2, 2015 That doesnt make sense to me. If the Auditors resigned several months ago, the Nomad only resigned a few weeks ago, so we clearly dont need auditors in place to have the services of a Nomad. Agreed. The purpose of a NOMAD and that of an auditor are not inter-dependent. Although if we didn't have an auditor, that would surely be an issue that the NOMAD would be concerned with. Also, its not uncommon for a NOMAD to be involved in the process of procuring an auditor... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.