cooponthewing 1,139 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 I thought he was badly hurt last week and said so on here. This is a huge loss and that bitter c**t Macinally is to blame. No doubt in my mind he told his players to go out and injure us, he said so on ssn. However it would appear that nobody finds that disturbing?? Our plod for example are more interested in lecturing old firm players before a match that hasn't been played yet than bothering about a manager advising his players to cause physical damage to opposing team members!. Where do you start with that? Anyone else fancy a change in formation?? 4-1-3-2 now?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rousseau 9,505 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 (edited) Nooooooooooo...!! I can't see Warburton making any significant changes, so it'll be a change we've seen before; Clark seems the obvious choice, despite not being the most encouraging. Edited April 13, 2016 by Rousseau 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 I think it will be Clark,same as against Killie Hopefully the same outcome. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooponthewing 1,139 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 He will surely play Dom a Ball in front of back 4, that would leave us 3 and 2, that was my thinking?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 pretty sure he'll play Ball 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whosthedado 1,522 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 Hammer blow to be honest. I was hoping something like this would happen to Griffiths - not the other way around 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooponthewing 1,139 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 Totally agree, which leaves us 4-1-3-2 Or 4-1-4-1 or 4-2-3-1??? My heads sore lol I fancy 4-1-3-2 with as I say Dom a Ball in front of back 4. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 I'm not sure why folks are now suggesting Dom Ball in front of a back 4 as if it was unlikely anyway. Dom Ball in front of a back 4 was a shoe-in for me. Halliday, Holt, McKay, Miller and one other from Clark, Law, Shiels I suspect - I would lean towards Shiels who has performed well when requested this season - play him in the anchor and move Halliday forward, or simply stick him in place of Forrester as a direct replacement 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooponthewing 1,139 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 It was just the formation I was toying with m8, agree Dom Ball a cert to start in front on back 4. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,304 Posted April 13, 2016 Share Posted April 13, 2016 I'm not sure why folks are now suggesting Dom Ball in front of a back 4 as if it was unlikely anyway. Dom Ball in front of a back 4 was a shoe-in for me. Halliday, Holt, McKay, Miller and one other from Clark, Law, Shiels I suspect - I would lean towards Shiels who has performed well when requested this season - play him in the anchor and move Halliday forward, or simply stick him in place of Forrester as a direct replacement I wouldnt play Clark. I think this game would be too much for him. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.