BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Nottingham forests Twitter is nffc not nfc Yes well it appeared to be @NFFC (NFC was my abbreviation) so apologies if it's fake news. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 It's not on their twitter either, unless they are going for the position of retail supervisor. Yes, sorry just trying to be helpful; I don't do Twitter, accepted it as genuine from a third party. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 (edited) So we give up the chance of getting a 7 figure sum because we're happy to see them go? Seriously? That appears to be the implication from the statement is it not? Then you have to look to the negotiating skills and motivation of the people in the boardroom. You and I might have been looking for at least the value of their wages for the rest of this season, possibly more; since if they were determined to leave we are holding the aces; but it seems that the Board were so keen to see the back of them that they were happy to let them go for nothing. Edited February 10, 2017 by BrahimHemdani 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooponthewing 1,139 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 What a mess. Ffs! Maybe they will pull there finger out their arse v Morton?? Try and look on a bright side??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 Well, unless they knew somesuch would happen in advance, why would they draw up a "strategy"? And even if they knew it, are we to expect that they find someone within a week that fits the bill? It's the job of the Board indeed their fiscal duty to plan for all eventualities. In football losing a manager is a regular occurrence, so having a replacement in mind even on a temporary basis should be par for the course. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman 9 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 You can't draw up a strategy when the board are split and have serious issues with each other Are you suggesting that because the board 'are split' is the reason they waited 4 days to tell us all MW & Co had handed in their resignations and that they have been accepted? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 That appears to be the implication from the statement is it not? But the board now get rid off them without paying compensation. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 It's obvious the Rangers board wanted rid off them and what has happened this week allowed them to do that without paying them any compensation. Exactly my point and if so the Board have played a blinder. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 But the board now get rid off them without paying compensation. Absolutely that's my point. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuGers 477 Posted February 10, 2017 Share Posted February 10, 2017 What a fucking mess. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.