limeburner 0 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Maybe thought they would be charged with "tapping up"? 3 - 0 down to Norwich after 18mins. Not really likely since Gers agreed to compensation fee being dropped. Perhaps compensation fee(having been dropped)was then asked to be a signing on fee and they were having none of it.(just a thought) 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,429 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Not really likely since Gers agreed to compensation fee being dropped.Perhaps compensation fee(having been dropped)was then asked to be a signing on fee and they were having none of it.(just a thought) There is a rationale for the manoevres, and it has to do with (more) money for the three caballeros. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,231 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Here's a thought IF big Eck got interim job he might make a better impression on teaching our defense especially the centre backs as he was a decent player himself. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Al Hasawi did hold talks with Mark Warburton about the managerial vacancy, according to Sky sources, but never offered the 54-year-old the role. http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11727/10763976/fawaz-al-hasawi-to-appoint-nottingham-forest-boss-in-summer 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,429 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Here's a thought IF big Eck got interim job he might make a better impression on teaching our defense especially the centre backs as he was a decent player himself. You would hope! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Not really likely since Gers agreed to compensation fee being dropped.Perhaps compensation fee(having been dropped)was then asked to be a signing on fee and they were having none of it.(just a thought) I suspect, much like the board say in their statement, that during a board meeting it was decided to simply accept the resignations and let them move out for free as things just weren't working out . I'd also consider the board knew Warburton & Co hadn't got the NF gig anyhow so there was no compensation to be had. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,429 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 I suspect, much like the board say in their statement, that during a board meeting it was decided to simply accept the resignations and let them move out for free as things just weren't working out . I'd also consider the board knew Warburton & Co hadn't got the NF gig anyhow so there was no compensation to be had. Allegedly, the Board was minded to bag them, anyway, next week it seems, with all the requirements for compensation for contract termination that that would entail. Thus the offers to resign fell like manna from Heaven. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 If FdB has said he is willing to talk then the board should be inviting him for Sunday lunch straight away. But i think he would need a bit of time. Our main aim is to get second place in the in the league therefore Walter should be option b. Dont think we have a hope of Marco Silva as Rab mentioned - he will be snapped up if he doesnt stay on with Hull. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
compo 6,138 Posted February 11, 2017 Author Share Posted February 11, 2017 Can't understand why the club were willing to waive compensation ,it's not as if we can afford that kind of geasture . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted February 11, 2017 Share Posted February 11, 2017 Can't understand why the club were willing to waive compensation ,it's not as if we can afford that kind of geasture . Because the Rangers board wanted rid off MW, DW & F McP. To do so was going to cost them £1.2m in compensation. Along came this agent and this meant they didn't need to pay the £1.2m 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.