craig 5,199 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 Apparently the excuse offered up to protect the reputation of the roly poly goaly is that it moved in the air, well not according to the video evidence from directly behind the shot it didn't. I disagree, I think the flight of the ball did change. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 I disagree, I think the flight of the ball did change. Whether the ball moved or not, this is just blunder of the year. No excuses! A blunder. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 Bluedan, always good to have an expert opinion Thought it made a change for him to come so far to come for that ball yesterday, but thought a one handed punch was the better option as he could've got more on it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 6,885 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 He cost me �£205 pounds on Saturday - took 7-0 to RFC at 40/1 Cammy F 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 He cost me �£205 pounds on Saturday - took 7-0 to RFC at 40/1 Cammy F Heh! Bet fucked after 2 mins. Unlucky bud. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 6,885 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 Heh! Bet fucked after 2 mins. Unlucky bud. Aye, never thought that it would end up 7-1 after that howler. Was going to take Boyd for a hatrick but decided to go for the 'stupid bet'.... Cammy F 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gribz 743 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 He cost me �£205 pounds on Saturday - took 7-0 to RFC at 40/1 Cammy F That would have been a sore sore bet if it was the last minute he fumbled 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmck 117 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 i dont know why everyone who comments on mcgregor feels the need to make speculations about "the lads head" and "believing his own hype", "too big for his boots" and all these things. pointless tabloid psychology from people who dont even know him to speculate. his performances have, however, been poor. could do with a spell on bench. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 I agree Barry - for me the only thing that should count is performance - and his performances haven't been up to the standard required. Deserves to be dropped. Look at Goram - he was a partier and had more off-field troubles than McGregor - the difference being that Goram invariably performed fantastically well on the pitch when it mattered. That is the only thing that should really count. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CammyF 6,885 Posted December 8, 2008 Share Posted December 8, 2008 I agree Barry - for me the only thing that should count is performance - and his performances haven't been up to the standard required. Deserves to be dropped. Look at Goram - he was a partier and had more off-field troubles than McGregor - the difference being that Goram invariably performed fantastically well on the pitch when it mattered. That is the only thing that should really count. WS dropped Goram when his off-field problems led to a drop in his on-field performances. Goram only required to be dropped once before learning - it appears McGregor has learned his lesson - his form is aweful at the moment. Cammy F 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.