Would King be any worse / better than the current incumbents?
Does King really have investment and football people lined up?
King may be yesterday's man, but on reflection, so are the current board.
Neither King NOR the current incumbents are what we need to propel the club forward in the medium / long term.
What we need is either, or both to make the correct decisions short-term for the medium / long term stability and growth.
For me, King would be who I'd trust more, but it's unlikely to happen.
We're at the stage both on and off the pitch that we ate simply hoping things are going to improve but with little or no evidence.
1 league title in 13 years, unless there is dramatic change, this is our future and it appears we are accepting consistent failure, downsizing and lowering of expectations. Hardly the Rangers way.