Bluedell
-
Posts
17,841 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
99
Everything posted by Bluedell
-
There's certain things that should be correctly dealt with in private. We have been on a high and have had the pages filled with positive news and now we are getting all this negative stuff. As rbr says, many would expect to go, and I don't see why it could have not been done without the negative spin.
-
FFS. I wish we had more parasites like him who were willing to invest �£20m into the club.
-
Very strange, and very unusual for someone like AJ to behave like that.
-
I don't think that a 5% holding would automatically guarantee you a place on the board.
-
Where are you getting that from, mate?
-
An attempt to avoid massive pay-offs?
-
I've done plenty of these in the past, albeit not for plcs, and the wording would not always reflect the reality. However given the Record's report, it seems that the wording was intentional, and it's disappointing that we are doing it all in public.
-
It's not a mistake though. They are no longer directors and therefore will have been removed as directors from the statutory books of the company. As I said, you would normally say "resign" but removed is OK, although unusual, and we don't know what the intention was. I would more stress my last sentence of the bit that you quoted.
-
I don't see in what way a mistake has been made.
-
I'm not suggesting it was an apprentice, but it could be someone like Whyte himself, who I'd suggest doesn't have a great deal of experience of company secretarial matters. Removed can be taken a few ways, and perhaps it was just meaning from as a director from the statutory books of the company. They could not be forcibly removed as directors as that would take a general meeting, I believe. An alternative explanation is that we have appointed a new company to oversee the stock exchange issues and perhaps their standard wording differs from that used in the past. We don't know the real reason behind it, but there are a number of innocent ones.
-
It would be normal to use "resigned" rather than "removed", particularly as resigned would be more factually correct. However it could be that the statement was drafted by someone who does not normally get involved in such things? It's probably best not to get too hung up on the wording.
-
No big surprise. AJ had already announced he was standing down and PM had obviously been vocal in the press, plus he was initially brought on board to advise on the financing of the G51 project which ended up being largely shelved so arguably there was no point in him remaining a director.
-
The usual bunch of crap. Ian, you really shouldn't post links to McGillivan's site and give him more hits to further his lies. So we have the stock exchange announcement saying that Wavetower is owned by Liberty Capital and some mad bigot saying it's owned by Jordan Nominees. Hmmm. I wonder which to believe? Jordan is a company which sets up new off-the-shelf companies, and would have registered its share as being owned by its nominee company. When it is set up, it will be initially registered at Companies House, including a note of who owns the share. When the off-the-shelf company is bought, in this case by Andrew Ellis, the share in the company will be transferred to its new owner. However this does not need to be registered at Companies House at this point. It will only be when the Annual Return is submitted will this information be updated. An amateur sleuth may come along and incorrectly assume that the information held at Companies House on shareholders is up-to-date and jump to some wild conclusions, but it's not and yet again, more lies are being peddled about our club.
-
Almost right
-
More poison being spewed from Celtic Park.
-
I'm not a huge fan of some of his articles but that's a good one. It reflects the feelings against celtic that you can see on other clubs' fans forums, Hibs being the most notable. Celtic have done themselves huge damage this season and fail to realise, and I'm afraid that all we are going to get next season is more of the same. The sooner Lennon takes his poison away from Scottish football the better. Edit: in case anyone missed the views of the Hibs fans: http://www.hibs.net/showthread.php?209677-Neil-Lennon&p=2803270
-
Mine only arrived this morning. There was a delay in sending them out. They should be able to deal with it at the door if necessary.
-
Provides leadership, guidance, direction....
-
I've got a couple of tickets but not sure whether I'll make it along. I never got there until about 9.30 last year and missed a lot of it.
-
http://www.hibs.net/showthread.php?209677-Neil-Lennon&p=2803270 Their rational views highlight what the informed neutrals think.
-
A reaction to the fact that Hearts are apparently going to report them for their vile songs and behaviour. -
They did mention it on the 6.30pm one. I guess I should be shocked that they dropped it later on but I'm not.
-
The BBC reported on it on Reporting Scotand last night. Not the same outrage as the other guy received though.
-
The official founding of Rangers was recognised as taking place in 1873 being when the club held its first annual meeting and staff were elected. This has now sensibly been revised to be the date of the first game that the club played in 1872.
-
It doesn't imply anything about being deserving. Celtic were in the position of having to win 4 games to win the league and they did not manage it, and they did throw it away as they were not good enough but there's nothing in that to suggest that we didn't ultimately deserve it.