Jim1955

Dream on, I'm afraid. We're still there to be blamed. We need a RSU........ A Rapid Response Unit.....to quickly respond to these claims and attacks.

Unfortunately, yes you can make it up. This is an example. I haven't seen the paper or it's website but if this is what they are claiming then, I fear they may be beyond redemption.

Hmrc might find it difficult to argue that the "Football Creditors" rule can apply in England but not Scotland albeit we have been coerced into it by the SFA. On the upside there an be no doubt now that we remain the same club. The new holding company has settled the debts of the old holding company. Of course the lawyers amongst us will no doubt point out where I'm wrong here.

Like it a lot, well done.

Seems that Beattie is now settling for St Johnstone, hard to believe that this was his first choice and looks like Rangers said no to his asking terms.

That is what a lot of supporters have been waiting for. I'm delighted to hear it.

Just good to be talking about a game again!

Is it possible that SDM has been informed or otherwise learned what the verdict in the Big tax case is?

That was fun.

Dual contracts would appear to be against SPL rules. Dodds knocks that on the head. As for the tax case I would suggest that HMRC would take a dim view of the SPL determining the verdict of tax disputes. The tax case is one potential liability that rests with the previous owners and noone else.

What it says on the label. If I was computer literate I would be able to post the link. It's on the bbc website. Can someone else do it pls?

SFA confirm full membership transferred to The Rangers.

It's lawell who is after our titles, noone else. He is a hate fulled bigot.

They also gave a response to something not worthy of a response, so go work that one out!

To paraphrase, the response from celtic of "not worthy of a response from celtic" this is simply another claim for "victimidation".

What would happen then if the SFA refuse us membership of if we were to reject it because of even more onerous conditions attached by the SFA?

BBC website y'day referred to Gers but today has reverted to newco Rangers, it is obviously an editorial decision. I wonder which editor or puppetmaster was behind this.

No great surprise to be honest. We can be certain that they will not discuss season ticket sales on a cash received basis from season to season. Hell mend them!

I'm certain that no compensation was paid.

Well there's interesting, they are certainly talking the talk, but can they walk the walk?

Will the commentary on BBC Alba be in the Gaelic?

As ever don't even think of asking whether the paying customer backs it before announcing it.

What's the price?

In footballing terms we were playing on the shoulder of the the last taxman defender. We all know that such a tactic can lead to tight decisions where sometimes we are offside, sometimes not! We are still waiting on a decision. There can be no concessions to a kangaroo court who have elected themselves to make this decision without having any authority whatsoever.

What's the view from the moral high ground like now?