Jump to content

 

 

forlanssister

  • Posts

    12,284
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    34

Everything posted by forlanssister

  1. That's a bit like your 12.% average IPO cost claim. http://www.sfo.gov.uk/fraud/sfo-confidential---giving-us-information-in-confidence.aspx http://www.sfo.gov.uk/contact-us/contact-details.aspx Anyway I'd be amazed if it wasn't handled by the former employee's legal advisers
  2. It alleges that there were at least 9 transactions which were of dubious legality or in plainer terms fraudulent.
  3. Contains very little information to be honest, caveated from the first page with cannot comment, ongoing investigations etc. Not a bondholder myself but had a look through my mates copy.
  4. Look up Operation Hornet.
  5. Report was sent to bondholders last week.
  6. Email fansforum@outlook.com
  7. Like most criticism of McCoist on there it succumbed to the delete button.
  8. Who from here is intending to attend?
  9. Yes, strike the middle one.
  10. I'm sure they'll be busting a gut to fend off the SFA/SPFL/Lieswell axis of evil!
  11. That's Easdale and Stockbridge f*&ked then eh, what "quality" do they bring exactly ? What matters is who harvests 50% + 1 vote on December 19th.
  12. I have no problem with him either in principle. I think both the pro spiv and anti spiv camps (in which I reside) may be reading too much into things, if the shares have as rumoured come from Green and Mather.
  13. That would be the not unwealthy sheikh who bought Manchester City in 2008 and the Graham Wallace who joined Manchester City in 2009 would it?
  14. forlanssister

    The Agm

    Yes .
  15. They also subscribed to pre-IPO shares at £1 each so they're sitting on a fair sized loss from them even when you factor in the 700k odd gratis shares Green has to give them imminently, they appear to be some way from any profit yet, guess we won't know for sure whether they are a positive or negative force in terms of our long term future till 19th December. You sure about the penny rise making them £350k that's 35m pennies!
  16. Reason enough to bung in a few quid.....
  17. Looks closer than your claim of 12.5% though.
  18. Perhaps so, but you still have to discount underwriting fees from you claimed 12.5%, as I said earlier the actual figure will be between your claimed 12.5% and his claimed 5%.
  19. Our IPO was not underwritten so there will be no underwriting fees to apportion.
  20. Should be somewhere between the two figures given the fact it wasn't underwritten unless of course you count Green's claim that he was going to buy up any unsold shares which given the fact that he didn't even pay for his 5m penny shares makes it even more outlandish that it initially appeared. I think the major problem that will come back to bite their arses is the pre-IPO fundraising as opposed to the IPO fundraising. Stockbridge can put any frock he wants on it but the various "fees" for all intents and purposes appear to be nothing other than a return of capital which is a big no no.
  21. We'd all like proof positive but if we're waiting for a signed lease as definitive proof then it'll be way too late.
  22. When he first floated Sports Direct he had massive corporate governance issues (and to a certain extent still does), it took a trashing of the share price by the market till he saw the error of his ways.
  23. Which one? The one with MediaHouse, the one with Keith Bishop Associates or the one with Newgate Threadneedle?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.