Crimson Dynamo

They need to cut costs and start living within their means. Most of these teams have fair enough youth policies they should start using them instead of spending thousands on someone no-one has heard of for nothing in return

The next evolution of Football I think will be regional Super Leagues of some sort. We’re already starting to see the beginning of this with the proposed formation of the Balkan Super League. http://www.sbnation.com/we-kick-balls/2012/10/10/3484688/balkan-super-league-possibly-on-tap-for-2015 When this happens on a larger scale I think it will make national leagues meaningless. It will keep the Champions League slightly interesting although I would think that it would be in much reduced format.

We are very close to the bubble bursting in England it won't be long. The Champions League even feels flat now

I bought my Rangers top from the store at Ibrox and it cost me £27. Things like the above are designed to rip people off in my opinion.

Lets just say Celtic did do everything they could to prevent the banner etc.. What then? Once the banner was unfurled was anybody ejected from the stadium? Was anybody reported to the Police? I very much doubt it A Celtic spokesperson said: “Celtic Football Club opposes all forms of offensive behaviour and unacceptable conduct and our supporters are well aware of what is expected in this regard.” I very much doubt that as well

If Craig Whyte does still have money in Rangers. Why would he come out now and potentially **** up the share issue he is out for himself pure and simple. The BBC just gave him a platform to do it and going by what I watched he just dug a deeper hole for himself with everybody involved

Possibly though I think he ripped them off by the sounds of it. I would like to see him answer questions on it

Not sure. He says he bought it knowing it was 75% likely the company would go into administration and also likely the company would be liquidated. Why would Ticketus knowingly agree to something like that?

Does he essentially admit to committing fraud in the interview? It certainly sounds like it

I like Charles green but i do think he says some things just for the sake of saying them

From a purely marketing and money making perspective i'd have no problem with naming Ibrox something different it would still be Ibrox to the fans. Look at Newcastle for example. Sports Direct Arena officially - St James Park to the fans

That could be down to a number of reasons. I would agree that it doesn't look good though. But surely Wylde wouldn't have needed the money

He was a loss to Rangers. But I think he walked away with his head held high. How many days did the wage cut rumble on for? One day it was they were all getting laid off then it was a deal has been struck. Then back to they're all getting laid off. That went on for a good week His agent probably whispered sweet nothings in his ear about the EPL and who can blame him for taking the offer it offered him security. As for the likes of Naismith et al. I had no problem with any of them leaving but they let themselves, the club and most of all the fans down the way they chose to go about it.

I had never seen Bajram Fetai's goal celebration it is well worth a watch!

Scottish Football is heading for meltdown. I give it two seasons at the most and I think it will be unrecognisable. I just hope it is for the better......

I actually quite liked the lilac top Rangers had in the 90's

I've been more and more impressed with Jim Traynor's writing recently. He has been one of the few journalists to be asking questions of the establishment instead of going with the crowd

Enjoyed that. Thanks for posting it

who did he play for?

Shunsuke Nakamura Mark Viduka Russell Latapy Scott McDonald Juan Sara Claudio Caniggia Sone Aluko Colin Samuel Kevin McKenna Fabian Caballero scratch Caniggia can see he isn't one from earlier posts

Sad news sorry to hear that. My thoughts go out to his family

http://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish_fa_news.cfm?page=1961&newsCategoryID=1&newsID=10593 Notice of Complaint issued: Charles Green Tuesday, 18 September 2012 The Compliance Officer has issued the following Notice of Complaint: Alleged Party in Breach: Charles Green (Rangers) Date: On or around 12th September 2012 Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached: (1) Disciplinary Rule 66 (Bringing the game into disrepute by calling into question the integrity of the Commission, chaired by Lord Nimmo Smith and appointed by the Scottish Premier League Limited (“SPL”) to examine alleged breaches of the SPL’s Rules regarding the use by Rangers PLC and Rangers FC of Employee Benefit Trusts to pay players, by suggesting in a media interview that the outcome and sanction of said Commission had been pre-determined by the SPL.) (2) Disciplinary Rule 71 (Not acting in the best interests of football by calling into question the integrity of the Commission, chaired by Lord Nimmo Smith and appointed by the Scottish Premier League Limited (“SPL”) to examine alleged breaches of the SPL’s Rules regarding the use by Rangers PLC and Rangers FC of Employee Benefit Trusts to pay players, by suggesting in a media interview that the outcome and sanction of said Commission had been pre-determined by the SPL.) Principal Hearing Date: Thursday, 4th October 2012 Mr Green has until Monday, 24th September 2012 to respond to the Notice of Complaint. Rule 66: No recognised football body, club, official, Team Official or other member of Team Staff, player, referee, or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall bring the game into disrepute. Rule 71: A recognised football body, club, official, Team Official, other member of Team Staff, player or other person under the jurisdiction of the Scottish FA shall, at all times, act in the best interests of Association Football. Furthermore, such person or body shall not act in any manner which is improper or use any one, or a combination of, violent conduct, serious foul play, threatening, abusive, indecent or insulting words or behaviour.

Does he not already have it? I thought he played for the reserves last week.........

Indeed. I think we would all agree that bloggers ask pertinent and challenging questions. But if no one of relevance sees them/does anything with them. Then what point do they serve?

Surely the schemes Rangers and Celtic ran are in essence the same. Meaning that either way the payments/loans to players were not declared to the SPL. Celtic have openly admitted this as I understand. So why no case to answer?