BlueMazza

Also the 'let the bigots die' and 'racism' aspects make me laugh, since Rangers have reported one of them to police now for the abuse Bartley gets - which we all know, is not a one off. Pot, kettle, black.

Do they even know what fascism is? Surely supporting the RA points to their own fascist leanings?

Have we lost it?

Sorry - but there are tons of threads and not enough time - are we appealing against all the sanctions or just the signing ban?

Ok so now I'm starting to think D&P are being a pain in the arse. Delays delays delays. The Knights may well have to take this legal route. I just don't know what I want now. A small part of me says O.K to liquidation just to screw the other clubs over. But no, I don't really want that.

Ah ok. So when is the appeal? Nothing like being away from it all

Is our appeal today? I'm lost & confused.

Gutted this happened whilst I was away, we would have been there with bells on. Really proud of to be a Bear though

I'm just back and haven't a fucking clue what's going on!

The Knighthood was before the crash and a lot of the problems began in America due to sub-prime lending. This WAS a world wide crash. I agree those at the top don't give a shit, I really do. I just didn't agree with the process of removal either.

Millions of people have been affected, my point is it wasn't solely him. Do you think he was the only person to make a decision ever? However, maybe it was HIM who did lose you money. I'm merely pointing out the rules of Knighthood removal and why he didn't fit into it. I've already stated I don't agree with them on the whole anyway. The government used all our monies, that's not in doubt but it wasn't the first crash & it won't be the last.

Criminality only counts when charges are brought. Neither Goodwin nor Murray have been charged. Knighthoods are removed: honours are sometimes removed (forfeited) if a recipient is convicted of a criminal offence or for political reasons (such as gross humanitarian violations) Goodwin became the media face of the crisis, albeit subsequently the FSA agreed he was instrumental, but lets be clear ONE man did not cause the Global financial crisis. He just became the target, someone for people to rage at. According to the set out guidelines, his Knighthood should remain. However, as a feminist I think Knighthoods are big pile of shite anyway, but that's not really the point

I didn't agree with Fred Goodwin losing his & I wouldn't agree with Murray losing his. His Knighthood was for business services to Scotland, not purely about Rangers. It all gets petty imo when we do this. Knighthoods are only meant to be removed for specific crimes. Bad management of a football club doesn't count.

You assume though that Davis wouldn't stay, that he'll only follow the money. He might not get back 100% of his wages but they will go back up again. No need to write him off yet.

I thought we all agreed the 'life long fan' thing was a badly-worded PR thing? However the rest of it seems fair enough. Rangers IS a business and he may be able to get us back on an even keel.

well I did, but only to say no more on here (have to have the last word )

I can give you a shit ton of DV stats if you want, but staying is not a mitigating factor no. However as Der Berliner has requested an end to this, we should leave it there. No need for caps, I still disagree with you.

We have a poet on the board! Anyway, as you were then...

LOL, it's just a debate...

Ah so because she did it too, she deserved any violence? Bollocks.

I never said anything about pissing where he died... Sorry IDGAF about excuses for drugs etc. Actions speak louder than words and all that.

Also a wife beater, anti-semite hypocrite.

FINALLY someone agrees with me on it. It's like your the mad cat-bin lady if you say anything about Saint John ffs.

John Lennon wrote good songs but wasn't a 'great' person from what I've read (yes I'm aware of 'believing what you read etc) Did the BK's ever fully confirm fans would get votes? Owning shares doesn't always give say on anything. Pledging cash doesn't necessarily equate to being a grown up though does it? I pledged cash too as did lots of others, but viewing a different bidder as preferred, than you do, doesn't make other people childish.

He hasn't 'threatened' anything lol. You don't 'threaten' to put in an offer. He said all along he would bid rather than see Rangers become NewCo. I thought he DID bid, but it was rejected. Last I checked there was no legal obligation for him to bid again. At least he didn't bid pie in the sky like the BK's.