Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,612

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    Do you seriously believe the monarchy or westminster parliament is involved in HMRC cases ? The question I ask is whether a caucus of yahoo-supporting polticians have been using influence on HMRC to financially cripple Rangers by pursueing a case so weak it has failed their own two internal appeals
  2. RANGERRAB
    So because he left office he had no influence and wasnt up to anything????
  3. RANGERRAB
    Ive always believe it was their intention to return a debt-free Rangers back to their client Whyte after administration but after it emerged what he'd been up to (non payment of PAYE and N.i.) that was never going to be possible But did Clark and Whitehouse never discuss a CVA with HMRC? Find that difficult to believe
  4. RANGERRAB
    And I think it has to be remembered there was an assumption of guilt by almost everyone including SPL chairmen and CEO's who voted us out the SPL. HMRC seemed to think they had an open & shut case with Rangers EBT's. They didnt. We need to find out why they thought this and who it was who instigated all of this
  5. RANGERRAB
    I dont think that's entirely correct is it? I seem to recall Clark & Whitehouse telling us during administration we'd get a CVA. What I find strange was that when it got refused HMRC seemed to suggest there never wasany chance of us getting one because of what Whyte had done. Clark & Whitehouse also said they were in constant contact with HMRC as I recall also. Was the possibility or not of a CVA not discussed with HMRC given they were rightly or wrongly the main creditor? All seems very strange to me
  6. RANGERRAB
  7. RANGERRAB
    Surely the EBT tax bill shouldnt have been included in allowing HMRC to be the main creditor because it was being contested?
  8. RANGERRAB
    It was only because of the alleged EBT tax bill that HMRC got to veto the CVA. It meant they became the biggest creditor. Yet this clown JimHarra doesnt seem to understand this?
  9. RANGERRAB
    I certainly hope you're correct Andy that people are now starting to ask questions.Not before time. I had to laugh at an article in the Daily Mail online this morning about the the tax avoidance schemes used by the likes of Gary Lineker, David Beckhametc which have now been sent 90day notices to settle. HMRC commented that these individuals tax affairs were 'private & confidential' Just a pity Rangers EBT's werent 'private & confidential' to prevent a slimeball like Mark Daly accessing them with apparent ease and making a fictitious documentary for which he won a now discrdited BAFTA.
  10. RANGERRAB
    Who is Jim Harra? He is talking nonsense when he says the EBT's werent the reason oldco went into liquidation. By including the alleged EBT debt it allowed HMRC to become the main oldco creditor which allowed them to reject the CVA. HMRC subsequently lost both appeals on this and are now pursuing this thro the CoS.The main oldco creditor would then have been ticketus who would have approved the CVA. Im not kidding when I say this whole damn thing was a set up. LBG too
  11. RANGERRAB
    The chairmen of those 10 clubs should be now asked why they voted Rangers out of the then SPL. A phantom EBTtax bill ? Which Rangers eventually won? Surely not. Maybe Killie did the right thing abstaining. Cant be a newco though. Celt@c did that in 1994 &2001 and didn't get thrown out
  12. RANGERRAB
    LOL....Tom Boyd. Is he the latest nonce to throw his 'new club' tuppence worth into the ring ? What does he base his assessment on then? Look, if you want concrete evidence Rangers arent a new club go to UEFA club rankings on their website. You'll see Rangers total from season 2010/11 to current season. UEFA dont see Rangers as a new club. Is there real any arguement after that? Seriously?
  13. RANGERRAB
    Other clubs and their supporters wanted us out of business altogether in 2012. Too many of our own supporters forget that
  14. RANGERRAB
    Liewell is about the biggest Rangers-hater you could meet.
  15. RANGERRAB
    When we got voted out the SPL and had to apply to the SFL the only place we were ever going was SFL3. Without us in the SPL it gave the yahoos a free run at tne CL every year. Liewell wasnt daft. He couldnt miss that opportunity could he?
  16. RANGERRAB
    If he didnt want us in SFL3 why did he vote us out the SPL?
  17. RANGERRAB
  18. RANGERRAB
    Neither Kingco or T3B or Ashley have told us how they intend to improve the dross on the park at present.
  19. RANGERRAB
    With the salaries being paid to the manager(on gardening leave) and over-the-hill players with no resale value thats no surprise to me.
  20. RANGERRAB
    WOW do you think McDowall would understand all that????? Nothing against the guy but he's simply a cones & bibs coach to me. I cant see him going anything other than 4-4-2 as it's all he knows and we risk a hammering
  21. RANGERRAB
    It is 1990's football and way past its sell-by date.
  22. RANGERRAB
    We've still got it. McDowall plays the rigid,inflexible 4-4-2 system both Ally and walter played. Opponents are wise to it & flood central MF so we get outnumbered. Im positively dreading sunday if we do that with Smith left MF and Aird right MF
  23. RANGERRAB
    They didnt do a very good job re-writing them did they? LOL
  24. RANGERRAB
    With all due respect Pete Ithink you're onto something different altogether here i.e. Corruption
  25. RANGERRAB
    What law doesnt? Giampaolo Pozzo owns three: Udinese, Watford & Grenada I would have thought UEFA would have wanted this sort of ruling harmonised throughout. Why did the SFA introduce it anyway?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.