Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,612
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. So you dont think being owned by Ashley would give us the financial security we need? And surely people must realise Ashley would need a successful Rangers in order for him to make any money? That means investment and he'd have a lot more to offer in that respect than the KIng & co offer last week
  2. Who? Sbragia?
  3. LOL. do you think he'll last that long? Especially after Bolton get relegated. They've no money remember
  4. You miss the point Craig. Bolton have accrued a massive debt living out with their means (no they've not gone into administration ) and Lennon, whilst Manager over at the east end, accused Rangers of financial doping when we were supposedly living out with our means by accruing the now discredited debt figure of £134m whilst in administration. Yes I do think he is a hypocrite for taking the Bolton job after all he said about Rangers alleged debts whilst the east end manager
  5. Which will be a lot harder than most people seem to think. Lose and we may well be finished. I think it is that clear cut even at this early stage
  6. Let's just see if Scotland actually qualify for Euro2016 before we start lavishing all the praise on the current Scotland management. I happen to think they'll have a difficult job beating Oirlund at the San giro next month. Lose that one and I think things might become very awkward indeed with both Poland and Oirlund starting well in the group
  7. How does he need 100percent? Didnt Keef do maths or arithmetic at school?
  8. How did these hedge funds manage to suck millions out of us? Who got what and how much? Please tell us
  9. What I'd rather hoped this was what the VB article would have been about was why Rangers were allowed to be voted out the then SPL. Regan & Doncaster rather neglected their duties in allowing club chairmen to vote on this issue IMO. What were their reasons for Rangers being thrown out? What has since transpired is that Rangers were indeed the victim of a fraudulent sale to Whyte & Rangers didnt owe anywhere near the much-quoted, laughable figure of £134m made up mostly of EBT tax liabilities at which HMRC now failed at both the FTTT & UTTT stages. Both of these (and whatever else) wasnt known at that time so of the vote what made therse chairmen vote as they did? Could these clubs now face financial claims as a result of these clubs' chairmen voting as they did?
  10. Wont this need to be approved at an AGM or EGM? Not much chance of that happening I wouldnt have thought
  11. Don't you think if Rangers were run properly it wouldnt need propped up by loans? By that I mean a decent scouting system, a youth set-up which provides players for the first team, not paying players over 30 £10K plus per week, etc, etc Why shouldnt Rangers be self-sustaining & profitable?
  12. I think your first sentence hits the nail on the head. There are too many unknowns & uncertainties about DK for my liking.I'm not convinced he's as wealthy as some make out for starters.
  13. When I heard he'd become Bolton manager I just laughed. Remember when he was over the east end hoping for title-stripping because we'd gone into administration/liquidation over what are now known to be fictitious debts once at the laughable figure of £134m and he accused us of financial doping by using players we couldn't afford? Well now Lennon is manager at a club whose debts are at a staggering £168m last I heard. And how did they get these debts? Paying transfer fees and salaries they couldn't afford maybe? Johan Elmander was a great example. Bought for £8m , paid £45k per week over three years then left on a free transfer. And there were others. Is Lennon a hypocrite or what?
  14. Until we are told where this money is coming from and who are involved(as Paul Murray promised last week) then this is all mere speculation as far as I'm concerned. This money must not be borrowed in the form of a 'ticketus-type' deal . And why the £16m figure if that was as quoted? Why not 20 or 25 ? Whats the significance of £16m?
  15. Some to have overall control of Rangers the way SDM did.
  16. Until we get an outright owner this could be the norm unfortunately. However this will hopefully change in the not too distant future
  17. What? There only were about 15 to 20 of them. Do their actions speak for the entire Rangers support? I think not
  18. Bolton are bottom of the Championship. Certainty to get relegated now. Him and The big swede won't see out the season. They won't cope with competition as they're used to a one team league or Lunny handing them wee favours. Wonder if he'll cause a referees strike down there? Dreadful appointment by Bolton
  19. He'll be gone soon. Must be gutted only getting £160k instead of £360k bonus. Onerous contracts indeed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.