trublusince1982

The players were deemed not good enough before the loan players came to the club not the other way round The loans are a consequence of the youths inability to step up. The youths inability to step up is not a consequence of the loans.

does that leave them just one more court to appeal to?

Who's reporting it mate?

If a player is not good enough to play it matters neither whether the player playing in front of him is on loan or bought he has not shown enough merit to be considered. My point was not in seriousness as gunslingers argument makes no sense. Playing a player who does not merit a position in front of 50,000 fans who will show displeasure at any continuing mistake does not improve a players chance of improving it does the opposite. The argument of they are our player so should play before a loanee is utilised, holds no water. It is not in the interest of the club or player to field sub par players in a high pressure situation. Players must earn their spot and be worthy that cannot be superseded by ownership

So if loan players hurt youth development by temporarily keeping them out the team then the same must be said for buying players! So should we get rid of waghorn so a lesser undeserving player like Hardie can play?!

his attitude prohibited his inclusion. Players benefit from playing with better players. Only the best should play for Rangers. Why you would want to aim lower than that standard to benefit an individual over the club is beyond me. Oduwa has brought us more recognition in his few weeks than McKay has in years. Long may it continue. I'm firmly in the Warburton camp on this one. Players need to show a minimum standard required before they get a game in the first team not after.

do you not think Barry McKay has raised his game through competition for places and has seen what response you get from the fans when you entertain? For me the likes of odowua and zalalem have opened his eyes and lowered his ego, giving us a better player.

Take care of your family mate don't waste a second worrying about this. Hope she gets better soon

Personally thought the armed force day this year was very poor. Can't see any soldier other than the 16 that got onto the park feeling any sort of uplifting emotion. felt more like going through the motions with no real out pouring of support or recognition. Get the troops back on the park and the atmosphere of togetherness front and centre.

Effort was lacking. Hopefully Warburton reads the riot act. Bad habit to shake

nailed it, bearger!

since starting to watch the press conferences this season it has became apparent how much the press make up stories.

He didnt back green. He made an assessment at the time of what was the best course of action for the future of the club. Telling fans to buy st was the correct call. Yes I plucked figure out the sky same as you are plucking reasons and actions out the sky. Your putting 2 and 2 together and getting 20.

the day is about the soldiers not the war. They deserve all the joy they can muster. Next you will want families to not have welcome home parties As bunting is unbecoming. Those serviceman I have spoke to who have taken part have all expressed the joy and thanks they felt. For once they felt loved and respected. The psychological benefit to each serviceman and women should be put first before the feelings of the precious few who think respect begins in sorrow Let our soldiers enjoy themselves they have already spent enough time in misery on your behalf.

Would take gourcuff in a second.

that green and white bow tie has sealed it!

whats your thoughts on the comparison bearman?

bar the mccoist bit my feelings exactly ,lets stick to the football and the plenty of positives happening at the club.

is that not a good thing? could he not have waited and got the job later? do you think its the only offer he has had or will get? should he not get a job? What would you have him do?

that's because it is complete and utter nonsense. He never backed green to get shares. gardening leave is severance in my mind, but your right he may have given up more than a 1/4 going with DK's comments. For all we know it could be back dated and the settlement agreed could include 6 months money or a years or a weeks since DK said talks were held up by him as he had more important issues to deal with.

what else does he mean by traditional rangers? how can you go back when we never left? idiotic comment that only encourages nonsense about us being a different club. The man needs to stop talking, he puts his foot in it every time.

he should stop doing press conferences and interviews.

worked for free took 50% pay cut gave up 1/4 of his severance kept rangers alive defended our titles All he is guilty of is being a poor manager( doubt that was on purpose although going by some you would think he did it on purpose). As a support we cant half be a bunch of lousy bastards at times.

dave king on rtv. good to see improvements at ibrox and auchanhowie are underway http://www.rangers.co.uk/news/rangerstv/item/10086-video-chairman-rtv-interview