Jump to content

 

 

Super_Ally

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    12,625

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Super_Ally

  1. Super_Ally
    I think whilst some members have congratulated the contributors for writing, collating and delivering the report (and for that they should be commended as you have yourself alluded to) there has not been congratulations yet of any achievements or goals being met. There is also a healthy dose of cynicism of the boards reaction to this, borne out of previous experience of the boards actions. I think you're perhaps misreading people who have congratulated the contributors for their work (mostly directed at Frankie as the project leader). I believe everyone is aware that nothing has yet been achieved, nor may it be and that the hard work is still to come. I am sure you are aware that the vast majority of Rangers fans are not dedicated users of message boards. If we are ever to have any impact upon the running of the club we need to try and mobilise the "ignorant" (sic) masses. Projects like STS can help achieve that and as Cal points out, even if all this does is help to raise awareness amongst the support and perhaps even increase unity then it has been a worthwhile venture.
  2. Super_Ally
    Hadn't really thought about it in that context until I'd seen it written down by Frankie (and you can't really argue with the point he makes). Quite sad when you look at it that way.
  3. Super_Ally
    I don't think anyone has suggested that it is not a distinct possibility that the club may/will not act on the points raised in the report. As you say that is no reason to dismiss the report, and the effort of those who contributed to it, out of hand completely. Perfectly reasonable to be sceptical, but all the better if you can look at the bigger picture at the same time.
  4. Super_Ally
    Moving under freedom of contract is he not (though we may get compensation due to his age). So not sure we have any right to be inserting any clauses. Not something i've come across before though, so accept I may be wrong.
  5. Super_Ally
    Surely not? He'll be off to Parkhead with that Swedish centre back we couldn't compete with them for.
  6. Super_Ally
    A very important point that should not be overlooked should the STS report manage to effect even just one change. Don't hold your breath. I know of some others who should be taking that line. It's about improving Rangers, and not taking the hump because it is not your idea specifically that is taken forward to change the club. As you say, if the club do go ahead and make changes, whether or not it is under the guise of the STS report it would be fair to suggest the report has been an instigating factor. Perhaps that will serves as an eye opener to the club that whilst many of the fans are not captains of industry we still have a wealth of talent and skills within the support.
  7. Super_Ally
    Ha ha, aye. SHould just concentrate on one thing at the time. Gabby in that pink dress with that cleavage put me off.
  8. Super_Ally
    Only saw last 20-30 mins. All Brazil. Did look the one they didn't give was a goal, but that was immaterial in the end. Gotta feel sorry for Brazil. Wont get too many opportunities to win a tournament graced by the likes of Brazil, Italy and Spain.
  9. Super_Ally
    The idea that the club can only be improved through one aim; ousting Murray, is surely false too? It might well bring about the biggest change, and possibly greatest improvement. Howevet it is certainly not the only way to improve the club.
  10. Super_Ally
    Just took longer because mine is more detailed. Superior research.
  11. Super_Ally
    From wiki: 16 in 54 for Bournemouth 06/08 6 in 36 for Wolves 08/present 4 in 11 Wales u21 07/08 1 in 10 for Wales 08/Present Wiki only shows league games/goals in the right hand box (sometimes get full stats lower down the page). Not an impressive strike rate but he is only 19. Will many of those be starts? Just checking soccerbase too. Only 4 starts in the league for Wolves. All comps: Wolves: 7 starts, 32 subs, 8 goals. Bournemouth: 42 starts, 17 subs, 16 goals. Unfortunately know nothing about him other than the stats I can find. Must have played for Wales u21 aged about 17 though. 10 full caps at 19 and getting some games for the team that won the Championship. Must have something about him. Edit: Jon beat me to it. :box:
  12. Super_Ally
    More than I knew. Doesn't sound too promising, though he is young I guess.
  13. Super_Ally
    Think the forum in question must be Wolves board on footy mad.
  14. Super_Ally
    Can't disagree with that. :spl:
  15. Super_Ally
    Easier to crap on other people's ideas than provide your own. Mocking people for trying to make a difference doesn't do you any favours.
  16. Super_Ally
    Ha ha, aye I could see that being it right enough. The Scottish Media would have a collective stroke.
  17. Super_Ally
    I was a bit confused by that particular assertion myself.
  18. Super_Ally
    Can I borrow your crystal ball for the next lottery draw?
  19. Super_Ally
    Ha ha, true. Was just a response to the suggestion we should be looking at him.
  20. Super_Ally
    Well they're not long out of administration.
  21. Super_Ally
    Cercle Brugge have just got rid of him too I believe. Wasn't cutting it.
  22. Super_Ally
    Ha ha. Can't argue with that.
  23. Super_Ally
    Who? Who else have they sold Shroomz? Other than Clarkson.
  24. Super_Ally
    A fit Stevie Naismith is a better player.
  25. Super_Ally
    From what I heard Lennon didn't impress at Partick. Which is disappointing as he looked like a real prospect to me.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.