Gazza_8 233 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 If Celtic had signed a player who had spat on one of our players there would be outrage amongst our fans. I'm not a huge fan of Neil Warnock but he hit the nail on the head when he called Diouf a sewer rat. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 We will just have to deal with it, no doubt the Scottish mhedia will have a field day. That's their back pages filled for the rest of the season, hopefully unlike Lennon, not the front ones. As long as he conducts himself well, as a Rangers player he will have my full support. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexscottislegend 2,090 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Have to agree with Gazza - sounds like he's here only because no one else wanted him. Be delighted if the leopard changed his spots but not holding my breath. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnyk 158 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 If Celtic had signed a player who had spat on one of our players there would be outrage amongst our fans. I'm not a huge fan of Neil Warnock but he hit the nail on the head when he called Diouf a sewer rat. Seems like our fans have another player to moan about and he's not even played for us. I really couldn't care less who Celtic signed or what they had done to our fans in the past. Their manager has done far worse than Diouf IMO....... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,179 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 :ehd: :dh: :kbartley: Welcome and good luck! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,179 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 We needed to improve/refresh our squad and we've done that - 'repugnant creatures' on loan or not. Also removing the ineffective Webster, Velicka and a few young lads means we've probably saved some money as well. It's all good! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 We needed to improve/refresh our squad and we've done that - 'repugnant creatures' on loan or not. Also removing the ineffective Webster, Velicka and a few young lads means we've probably saved some money as well. It's all good! Its not all good Frankie it is just another piece of paper covering a huge crack. I know what you mean though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,179 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Off the field we're struggling mate but I think we've just strengthened on the field which is why I'm feeling a bit more positive. Sure loan deals only emphasise the short term nature of our operations nowadays but we needed competition for places and I think we've got a bit more of that with these signings. I think Diouf is particularly interesting. Sure his background is a bit distasteful but it will be good to have such a player in our team instead of nice guys who pull out of 50/50 challenges more often than not. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 Off the field we're struggling mate but I think we've just strengthened on the field which is why I'm feeling a bit more positive. Sure loan deals only emphasise the short term nature of our operations nowadays but we needed competition for places and I think we've got a bit more of that with these signings. I think Diouf is particularly interesting. Sure his background is a bit distasteful but it will be good to have such a player in our team instead of nice guys who pull out of 50/50 challenges more often than not. I agree I am happy with the Diouf signing and lets not forget the tims cannot throw any stones as their very own manager does not too bad on the spitting front as well. If Diouf plays as he did in the past then he will be a great signing. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 I wonder how much money we have actually spent this January ? Is the fee received for KM still in Walters kitty? Has the wages of our departed players, covered the incoming ones. Blackburn must be paying a percentage of EHDs wage, too high for our pockets. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.