der Berliner 3,318 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 For the time being, can we revert to the topic of this thread? While the ifs and buts are all interesting, we should leave this thread for info on the membership issue. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Any agreement that leaves the EBT's/dual contract nonsense to be settled at a later date means it's a fait accompli that the titles et al will be stripped and further punishment awaits. The threat of mutually assured destruction is the only card we have to play to shut down that nonsense. you'll be familiar with the concept of admin plus one no doubt. its been mooted as the game plan and best achieved by not getting a licence. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,138 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 you'll be familiar with the concept of admin plus one no doubt. its been mooted as the game plan and best achieved by not getting a licence. I am not familiar with this,GS, could you enlighten me please? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,062 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 I am not familiar with this,GS, could you enlighten me please? It means Whyte could theoretically regain control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 I am not familiar with this,GS, could you enlighten me please? as I understand it the administrators can't sell rangers assets to whyte in the first administration(the one we've had) but a second administration allows him to take direct control again. it happens in business sometimes apparently. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 a poster on ff who certainly talks a good game ha been saying for a month or so that this is the plan. I have my doubts personally. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,318 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Maybe I am utterly wrong, but did not Whyte sell Rangers FC (shares and all) to Green et al for 2 pounds, while Green purchased the assets from the admins. BTW, different thread maybe? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waltersgotstyle 297 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 as I understand it the administrators can't sell rangers assets to whyte in the first administration(the one we've had) but a second administration allows him to take direct control again. it happens in business sometimes apparently. I honestly don't think Whyte is that stupid...; 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Moon 1,138 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 a poster on ff who certainly talks a good game ha been saying for a month or so that this is the plan. I have my doubts personally. I really don't think that will happen, given how unpopular he is with our support. He was allegedly afraid to meet JB 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 The possibility of Rangers not getting a licence is just exactly what timmy craves ...in that event other clubs will surely fold, professional football in Scotland will eventually die and EUFA will rubber stamp their dream move to England. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.