Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

I wonder who sanctioned this. Easdales, Wallace, our Puppetmaster?

After this statement, Green's third coming, and the supposed U-turn on the Laxey loan, am I right in thinking that the Board and those behind them are getting nervous?

 

I do wonder how much humble pie people are willing to diggest if there is no "puppet master" after all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And how much are you eating when you realise it's already clear there is. Green had a 29 percent proxy now Easdale does. Do you think either was the puppet master? Do you think it's a different 29 percent do you think it was a different 29 percent that green offered to sell to McColl foe 25 million or whatever. That 29 percent is running our club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And how much are you eating when you realise it's already clear there is. Green had a 29 percent proxy now Easdale does. Do you think either was the puppet master? Do you think it's a different 29 percent do you think it was a different 29 percent that green offered to sell to McColl foe 25 million or whatever. That 29 percent is running our club.

 

Unless proven otherwise, I do assume that the Easdales do their stuff for the Easdales, not Green or anyone else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless proven otherwise, I do assume that the Easdales do their stuff for the Easdales, not Green or anyone else.

 

So everything they do is for there 2 percent the other 27 percent people gave then control of (green included) is just coincidental.

 

Hmmmmm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do wonder how much humble pie people are willing to diggest if there is no "puppet master" after all?

 

Each to his own opinion.

It's nothing that can be proven, but it's all too bloody obvious to me.

I can assure you that I won't be digesting any humble pie.

The only way I can be wrong is if there are puppet masters as opposed to a puppet master.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing to remember is just because you believe in something you can't prove, it doesn't make people stupid if they don't yet believe it without enough evidence, especially if they are agnostic about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.