Rangersitis 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 (edited) And I was just saying your opinion was wrong and misinformed. I didn't mean that either, however the people being talked about here likely weren't even part of the electorate, and their move seems to be to call for all out boycotts rather than maybe going to the fans board and expressing their concerns. The latest gem when discussing a possible LC semi final against Celtic..... I don't want THEM but if we do...they shouldn't be allowed anywhere near Hampden. With 'they' being the UoF, SoS and all those that have aligned themselves with them in boycotting games, merchandise etc. Edited October 29, 2014 by Rangersitis 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 The latest gem when discussing a possible LC semi finalagainst Celtic..... With 'they' being the UoF, SoS and all those that have aligned themselves with them in boycotting games, merchandise etc. Plenty are saying the same thing. You don't think it would be quite a cheek for those people to want to go to a semi final against them considering they've pretty much given up supporting the team? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Plenty are saying the same thing. You don't think it would be quite a cheek for those people to want to go to a semi final against them considering they've pretty much given up supporting the team? Are the numerous reported sightings of Craig Houston at nigh on every match untrue? How have the Union Bears given up supporting the team? Why should someone who boycotted the game last night, but has been at every other one this season, be barred from getting a SF ticket? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 The latest gem when discussing a possible LC semi final against Celtic..... With 'they' being the UoF, SoS and all those that have aligned themselves with them in boycotting games, merchandise etc. Perhaps banning the boycotters will be put forward at the next meeting 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Perhaps banning the boycotters will be put forward at the next meeting There were about 40k missing last night. Will do for starters. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Perhaps banning the boycotters will be put forward at the next meeting Sad but probably true..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Has the office bearers being elected yet? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Perhaps banning the boycotters will be put forward at the next meeting Any proposals that seek to, or that would lead to inflaming the 'situation' and further dividing the support would not reflect well on the proposer. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Any proposals that seek to, or would lead to inflame the situation and further divide the support would not reflect well on the proposer. Depends who you ask. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted October 29, 2014 Share Posted October 29, 2014 Has the office bearers being elected yet? Faceless but hairless ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.