Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

The person we owe the money too will be underwriting the share issue, how does that work?

 

Not much different than Letham's or Easdale's, who are shareholders and lent us money. Given that Ashley set this up, you would assume he has already talked to or is about to talk to the SFA about his percentage and plans. Else his statement about underwriting the issue would be somewhat strange.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This should be a reminder for those who need reminding that Ashley is lending money to Rangers - not gifting it. This idea that Ashley has £50m in loose change to donate to the club is far-fetched. It's a loan, five minutes after the other loan. Rangers could be on the way to becoming so loaded with debt that it eventually becomes an unmanageable burden.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For me the most important thing in that statement is given the timing and the fact that it's being made available before the end of the month, it looks like this extra £1m loan is going to at least partly be used to help pay November's bills because not enough is left of the recent £2m loan from Ashley to cover this month's bills.

 

That assumption is arguably backed up by them also saying:

 

"The Directors have begun a cost cutting exercise, but further working capital in addition to the Facility will be needed before the end of the year"

Edited by Zappa
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the timing of the further £1m loan coincidental, following the letter from the RST to the Stock Exchange, or was this done to match the terms offered by Brian Kennedy? I generally don't believe in coincidence and I am not about to start now!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much different than Letham's or Easdale's, who are shareholders and lent us money. Given that Ashley set this up, you would assume he has already talked to or is about to talk to the SFA about his percentage and plans. Else his statement about underwriting the issue would be somewhat strange.

 

Did I miss a statement about a share issue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stating the obvious here, but when they wrote:

 

"The Directors have begun a cost cutting exercise, but further working capital in addition to the Facility will be needed before the end of the year"

 

They're talking about end of December.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the timing of the further £1m loan coincidental, following the letter from the RST to the Stock Exchange, or was this done to match the terms offered by Brian Kennedy? I generally don't believe in coincidence and I am not about to start now!

 

Could be that they realised they may have breached their fiduciary duties and have taken remedial action, if that is what's happened then why opt for the poorest option in the first place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.