Jump to content

 

 

David Bates has signed with Hamburg


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Gonzo79 said:

PR obviously isn't your strong point, Darther.

Maybe not PR....but common sense & an understanding of the English language are pretty high on the list.  Also, the ability to read between the lines & accept that there may be multiple meanings behind a simple statement.

 

There is enough folk outwith our fanbase who will happily pick apart & scrutinise EVERY word that is said....leave them to it.

Edited by Darthter
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gonzo79 said:

Giving ammunition to those who hate you is not very bright, regardless of multiple meanings.

 

Couldn't and Wouldn't mean different things at face value.

but in this context, they mean exactly the same thing, namely there are factors (which weren't disclosed) that prevented the club matching (or improving) Hamburgs offer.

 

The club couldn't match the offer cause the didn't thing the player was worth it!

or

The club wouldn't match the offer cause the didn't thing the player was worth it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

At the end of the day, his comment makes our club look weak, regardless of any over-analysis or understanding of the English language.

Nothing wrong with the comment....the over analysis of every word by our OWN fans & the constant belittling of our manager, make us look weak. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, craig said:

All that aside, the grim reality is that they still operate under Employment Law, the same as any other employee of any other company.  If Miller and Wallace were showing subordination then the Club had every right, almost an obligation actually, to take the action they did.

 

You are trying to defend their actions based on the specificity of how they got to where they are - there is nothing in Employment Law which says you can act in a subordinate manner just because you were scouted in primary school or get paid tons of money. 

 

The point Darthter is making, correctly, is that these two individuals, regardless of profession, wage, or standing - are employees of an entity which gives them both the protection and the obligation to operate under employment law, just like you, Darther or myself.

 

Debating how they got there is irrelevant - they are still employees governed by the same legislation as the rest of us.

What are you talking about Craig? What has this got to do with Miller and Wallace?? 

You're taking my reply to Darther and extrapolating it into completely different threads. At 13.03 yesterday Darther made a post directed at me that I felt was total nonsense. He suggested my work situation was similar to that of professional footballers when in the real world they're totally different. Anyone who thinks that Rangers players follow the same guidelines in their work as 'normal' people is delusional. Extra leeway in many areas, payments off the books, blind-eye turned to misbehaviour and a litany of other benefits are regularly bestowed on pro footballers in an attempt to keep them sweet if they are producing the goods on the park. Frankly, anyone who thinks pro-footballers have to live by the same rules as the rest of us has very little understanding of how the sport actually operates. Employment law is followed when it suits them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JohnMc said:

What are you talking about Craig? What has this got to do with Miller and Wallace?? 

You're taking my reply to Darther and extrapolating it into completely different threads. At 13.03 yesterday Darther made a post directed at me that I felt was total nonsense. He suggested my work situation was similar to that of professional footballers when in the real world they're totally different. Anyone who thinks that Rangers players follow the same guidelines in their work as 'normal' people is delusional. Extra leeway in many areas, payments off the books, blind-eye turned to misbehaviour and a litany of other benefits are regularly bestowed on pro footballers in an attempt to keep them sweet if they are producing the goods on the park. Frankly, anyone who thinks pro-footballers have to live by the same rules as the rest of us has very little understanding of how the sport actually operates. Employment law is followed when it suits them. 

Sounds like EVERY other employer on the planet....

 

As for "following the same guidelines"....its Law, that covers every employee/employer regardless of the nature of your business.  The specific details of a players contract will very from that of a shop work, but its the same rules & legislation for both.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.